Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Not every country left. We are supposed to lead, not follow.
|
So leadership, even if it involves leading your people into an ambush, is good? The people who followed England out of Benghazi, are still alive.
Come on, Paul. Multiple countries and the Red Cross got their people the hell out of Benghazi. Not only did we leave Stevens there, but we denied his repeated requests for extra security. Hindsight is always 20-20, I don't expect anyone to be able to predict the furure every time. But are you going to tell me that this wasn't badly bungled? Really?
- Multiple countries leave Benghazi, because they realize they can't keep their people safe.
- We leave our people there.
- Stevens asks for more security, his bosses decline.
- during a 13 hour attack, no outside assets were brought to help in the fight, except for 4 guys who drove themselves to the Tripoli airport and arranged for a plane to fly to Benghazi, then arranged for a car to take them to the CIA station.
- after the attack, every statement Hilary made in private, claimed it was a terrorist attack. Every statement she made in public, blamed a spontaneous reation to an offensive video (and therefore, not something she could have foreseen or prevented).
That's effective leadership?
Come on. If you think there's no cause for concern there, that's as bad as my saying that Bush responed well to Hurricane Katrina.