View Single Post
Old 08-07-2018, 11:25 AM   #14
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F. View Post
"blaming the Russians"
The investigation is not over, is it?
"embracing MS13"
the Democrats no more embraced MS13 than Trumplicans embraced white supremacists
"attacking Trump for continuing Obama's immigration policy of separating kids from parents"
The Bush and Obama administrations policy was not to seperate ALL from their children as the policy was under the current administration
"pretending the low unemployment is bad"
I think the correct word would be claiming, much like Trump claimed that the unemployment numbers were false before he was elected
"nominating socialists and parading them around"
Some nominate a socialist or two, some nominate a white supremacist or child molester
"parading around a fake Indian"
The only parading done in that case is by Trumplicans claiming that 10 years ago she said, much like Obama's birth certificate or Trumps Swedish grandfather
"claiming (for the first time in 10 years) that debt is bad"
Asking why Trumps campaign promise that he would reduce the debt like no one else ever is false
"claiming (for the first time in 10 years) that a soaring stock market is bad because of income inequality"
Being concerned about income inequality and it's effects on our democratic society
"claiming (for the first time in 10 years) that using the nuclear option isn't democratic"
You got me, they made a stupid move five years ago
"suggesting that letting Willie Horton use the ladies room if he feels like it, is a good idea."
That's about the most prejudices you can possibly get into one statement
"The investigation is not over, is it?"

Will it ever be over?

"The Bush and Obama administrations policy was not to seperate ALL from their children as the policy was under the current administration"

Oh, So how come I never heard any liberals go berserk that SOME separation was OK? Sure seemed like they were opposed to all separation, even when they had to invent it, like TIME magazine did on their cover.

What happens to American citizens who are processed through our criminal justice system? Do they bring their kids, or are they separated? They are separated. How come the left never cared?




""pretending the low unemployment is bad"
I think the correct word would be claiming"

Whatever. That ditz from Queens, who is a hero of the party, thinks low unemployment is bad. This is what she said. That just makes all kinds of sense. And soon, she will be writing federal laws. Hooray!

"nominating socialists and parading them around"
Some nominate a socialist or two, some nominate a white supremacist or child molester"

Who nominated an admitted (or convicted) child molester, and which party, knowing he was a child molester, send them to highlight at fundraisers? Please elaborate, I cannot wait to hear it.



"The only parading done in that case is by Trumplicans claiming that 10 years ago she said, much like Obama's birth certificate or Trumps Swedish grandfather"

So you are claiming that we invented the lie that Warren claims to be an Indian? That it's a fake scandal? The birthers were known to be kooks because they kept claiming he wasn't born here, after evidence was shared. What evidence is there, that Warren is an Indian? Trump offered to donate $1 million to her favorite charity if she'd take a DNA test, and she refused. Why in Gods name would she deny her favorite charity (probably some fun-filled group of Marxist bra-burners), a million bucks, while at the same time being able to show that all the doubters were wrong? I can think of one reason...you?? How many reasons?

"Being concerned about income inequality and it's effects on our democratic society"

yet you didn't give a rats azz about income inequality when the stock market SOARED during the Obama years. How come? Answer - your concern over income inequality is selective, which means it's fake.

""suggesting that letting Willie Horton use the ladies room if he feels like it, is a good idea."
That's about the most prejudices you can possibly get into one statement"

How is it wrong? If Willie Horton says "today, I identify as a woman", liberals feel that he is then allowed into the ladies room. How is that wrong? We're all supposed to take the word for every man who says "I am a woman, now let me follow your daughter into the bathroom", and none of you thinks that a predator might lie to take advantage of your breathtaking naivete? Predators lied to become priests, and went through the trouble of going to the monastery, just so they could get access to little boys. You don't think they'd claim to be transsexual?
Jim in CT is offline