Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
The Supreme Court has not yet ruled on that particular privacy issue (apparently, re Roe v Wade, privacy is an important right). Various state courts are leaning to giving jurors that right.
And if the First Amendment gives the public a right to know the jurors, there is no specification as to when that right kicks in. One could assume if the public has that right, it would have it before or during as well as after the trial.
There seems to be a lot in dispute and undecided about the issue. And about even if you have the right to publish names and addresses, is it ethical to do so. And maybe even about "What many see here".
|
This link is not about possible pending court case or the issue of privacy.. and that was not the Idea floated in the story ..
... the issues is very clear a request for the names of those seated is not outrageous or intimidation or disturbing and almost unprecedented. as claimed by the link provided .. thats it
But Truth isnt Truth either a breitbart reader on the interview with chuck todd
"what show were *you* watching? He made Chuck U. Toad look like a moron.