Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Why is the religious freedom argument weak, exactly?
Is it because he was willing to sell them a pre-made cake for use at a gay wedding, but not make another cake? That would seem to weaken his case I guess...I didn't know he was willing to give them an already made cake.
|
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/01/o...mendment.html\
As to Mr. Phillips’s free exercise of religion claim, the Supreme Court has said that the First Amendment is not a license to discriminate in the face of neutral, generally applicable laws like Colorado’s. In 1968, a few years after the Civil Rights Act passed, the court ruled unanimously against the owner of a South Carolina barbecue chain who invoked his religious freedom to refuse to serve black people. The act “contravenes the will of God,” he claimed. The court called that argument “patently frivolous.”
That was the paragraph above the one I started quoting. He is argueing more on the freedom of speach than a religious one.
I think all of his wedding cakes where considered "custom" cakes. He would sell them cup cakes or pies - same as everyone else.