Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
"The evidence tells a story that does not match the explanation (Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross) gave for his decision," Roberts wrote. "The sole stated reason seems to have been contrived."
If the evidence tells a story that does not match the explanation then the reason is invalid. Full stop.
|
"Seems" is not valid substantive legal evidence. I suppose that is why it was remanded to the lower court for further investigation.
Although from some of your past posts, for you, "seems" seems to be synonymous with "conclusive" or with "fact."