Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
trying to go around the Law and promoting a false Narrative NRA and gun makers word games
Like Bump stock simulate rapid Fire their not making gun full Auto if your in denial ... ATF noted that according to Slide Fire, the device “is intended to assist persons whose hands have limited mobility to ‘bump-fire’ an AR-15 type rifle.”
https://youtu.be/x0f7OCnrrpkor Please note his trigger finger not moving and if someone think thats not Automatic fire they shouldn't own a gun
suppressors-good-for-our-hearing yea thats why they are made i thought that was what ear plug were for?
https://www.nraila.org/articles/2011...or-our-hearing |
WE ARE IN )#*$#$$!@ AGREEMENT on Bump Stock / slide fire. YOU ARE NOT READING THE EFFING QUOTE. I am cApLoCkInG so you might stop to read rather than narrativetalkingpoints. You are going down the road of NRA this and that and jumping topics. (PS - not yelling mad, yelling shockingly but with @#(*#$@#$ smiley faces
)
As for trigger control, some are way faster than others (though when speed goes up accuracy typically goes down). Kindofa stunt like a ProgressiveSocialist 22 year old mom's basement with Cataracts "Medical Marijuana" recipient searching for a higher THC count. Well, except Medical Marijuana is not in the Bill of Rights.
As for noise? Any reduction in noise DBA at your ear is beneficial, no?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
|
A good read on how MOST legislation is effed up by our elected officials and often written by Lobbyists. Ever hear of the Affordable Care Act?
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
QUOTE=JohnR
I'm OK with banning bump stocks
QUOTE=WDMSO
trying to go around the Law and promoting a false Narrative NRA and gun makers word games
Like Bump stock simulate rapid Fire their not making gun full Auto if your in denial
see...even when you agree they keep arguing like you disagree...talk about perplexing  ...it's almost like marriage |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DZ
I feel the same way. Perhaps a better flag would be a public listing of any gun owner who owns more than a certain number of weapons (pick a number). Listing of weapon owners would be publicly posted at city/town halls and printed in local media (newspaper) quarterly. Just as gun owners have a right to bear arms I think residents and law enforcement have a right to know if there is a "private arsenal" for lack of a better word in their neighborhoods. All to often neighbors say they had "no idea" their neighbor had that many weapons. If they knew maybe they could monitor behavior more closely and alert law enforcement.
|
So you think posting the address of people that have X amount of firearms, publicly, would be a good idea? The two biggest firearms problems we have are suicides and violence with youth / gang - frequently with stolen / underground weapons.
Good idea?