Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Not necessarily, you could easily pass along an email thread containing classified information without even knowing it.
I've read that one "should have known" incident was discussing a public NYT article about drone strikes simply because the drone program was classified. Big whoop...
I'm glad they did the detailed investigationand that they found no evidence of intentional wrongdoing or cover up...conspiracy theories be dammed. You should also put the FBI comments on context of the IG report calling out lax information handling at State well before Clinton.
Fundamentally there's not a lot of new info here aside from the fact that the issue isn't worthy of prosecution...
|
You are completely out of your gourd. She said that 0 emails were flagged as classified or higher, when she sent. There were over 100. The FBI director said no reasonable person could have failed to know they were being reckless. She's a pathological liar.
But when you won't concede she lied about the sniper attack, I guess denying that she lied here is nothing.
The FBI has concluded that she was extremely careless with the handling of sensitive information.