Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Quite simple, until it comes out of the woman’s body it’s part of her and she gets to make the decision.
Next will be to ban birth control on "personhood from conception."
That's why they're going after the viability test.
If they drop the viability test, there's nothing to stop them from declaring "personhood," law.
That would outlaw hormone-based (pill/iud, etc.) birth control.
It wasn't hyperbole when people said that conservatives wanted a government small enough to fit in your bedroom. That's what throwing the right to privacy out the window gives them.
It's not only hyperbole, it's nonsensical.
|
Saying that the fetus is a part of the woman's body (or the man's, since we are now informed that men can have babies) is not "following the science." We are told that we must follow the science, murky, unsettled, and disputed as it is regarding the various issues with Covid, but re abortion, we can just make up stuff to make our opinion persuasive, "scientific."
The fetus is not part of the woman's body. Nor is the woman a part of the fetus's body. It is a separate being with it's own distinctive DNA.
Here's a short and interesting article re Justice Sotomayor's willful ignorance about the matter and re the fetal viability and humanness concerns:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...?ocid=msedgntp