Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The guy is on record having baked a cake for a wedding between two dogs. Was he participating in that also?
-spence
|
What is the "record"? Were the dogs gay?
Did they have a marriage license? Do they qualify for government marriage benefits?
Did the dogs say "I do" and pledge faithfulness for the rest of their lives?
Is the judge comparing a dog wedding to a gay marriage?
Does the baker's religion say anything about dog marriages? I believe the bible condemns humans from sexual relations with other animals, but doesn't condemn dogs doing it with dogs.
Or was it one of those cutesy things pet owners do which have no relation or meaning to the rest of society? You wanna make your dogs get "married," which don't amount to a pile of dog poop in terms of what marriage is as recognized either by religion or government? Don't mean squat to me (the baker) since it ain't for real. Here's your cake.
This judge is the kind of progressive joke that has been played upon this country and its traditions and constitutional laws. He, like the progressive judges who have "transformed" this country's governing structure from bottom up to a top down, adjudicates not by law, but by personal or agenda driven points of view. His type has made the judiciary the high priests of morality and the good rather than judges of the law. It didn't used to be, under a legal system, the judge's role to decide what was harmful to society. That used to be a matter left for society itself to determine.