Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
"That's not what I said."
Here's what you said...
"It wouldn't surprise me if the Marines were higher partly due to the opposition from their leadership."
If you can tell me that there's a significant difference between what you said, and what I claimed you said, I'm willing to listen.
|
I doubt you are, but here goes...
Of all the military leadership, the Marine Commandants have voiced perhaps the most vocal opposition to DADT on the basis that it won't enhance the fighting force and may be a distraction that would cost lives.
If my direct leadership said the same in context of my personal duty it would certainly be a factor in my position on the matter.
Quote:
"Name one "fact" presented in this thread that I've "dismissed".
58% of combat marines are opposed to repealing DADT. Instead of accepting that those who are in that situation could have a valid concern, you dismiss it, claiming that those men were coerced into being opposed to repealing DADT by their commanders.
|
Good to see you use the updated statistics.
By pointing that out I actually recognized that there's a statistical concern. I also mentioned that from what I've heard this concern is being factored into the strategic shift in direction.
Hell, this is validation if anythings else, and a far cry from an accusation of "coercion". Once again, you're just applying your radical left-wing template on the situation, rather than reading it for what it is.
-spence