Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Rowe v Wade
All because some appointed people believe in the absurd originalist doctrine that claims
(1) we should ignore changes in social conditions or context
(2) we should trust politically motivated lawyers to interpret the contextual meaning of anything that happened 300 years ago.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
but you’re only ok when liberals can decide “what they meant to say” in the constitution”.
if you want the constitution to mean something other than what it says, either amend it, or deal with it.
again, you’re wrong. it’s your side who wants to trust lawyers, unelected lawyers at that, by saying SCOTUS has the authority to set policy.
Better to leave that to legislators who we can remove if we choose.
You have zero grasp of the role of the different branches of government.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device