Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The AP is reporting the news. How the Internets respond to the news is a different thing.
The OP referred to "imaginary WMD's". If the UN knew about this and didn't see a significant threat and multiple US investigations knew about this and didn't see a significant threat...how could these represent valid WMD's?
Were these the WMD's used to justify the Iraq war? Is that what Beans is saying?
-spence
|
I was saying is if they are not viable weapons then why were they being guarded?
Why did the "rebels" risk lives to take the bunker?
And why is it being reported as news? If they captured an empty bunker?
Since all 3 of those things hapened I tend to believe there must have been at least some of those weapons that were useable, or the damaged oned were since replaced by viable weapons, which would now be in the hands of the "rebels".
In other news: "Rebel forces capture Little Tommy's tree house that was built on the site where a ammunitions building "USED" to be".