Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
The minority opinion loses
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
The dissent makes valid points. They are put on the record. And they can be used in future arguments, as they have been.
Ross gave an explanation. It was not an unconstitutional reason. It was a valid reason. Roberts admitted as much. But he claimed that it seemed to conflict with previous things Ross had said or did. Why should it have to comport with what he said or implied previously?