Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Hopefully you’ll be happy
A clearly angry Kagan pulling no punches: "The current Court is textualist only when being so suits it. When that method would frustrate broader goals, special canons like the 'major questions doctrine' magically appear as get out-of-text-free cards"
These opinions will be read by historians--if we are lucky enough to have historians in the future--as the desperate warnings of good people as the country is overrun and destroyed by bad people supported by people who refuse to understand that our lot is theirs, too.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
the court was liberal for 50 years. It’s not carved in stone it must be so forever. Elections have consequences.
Why are you ok with unelected bureaucrats setting national policy? isn’t it better if elected legislators enact policy, so that we can respond at election time?
Again, you seem to have a real issue with the conceit of a representative democratic republic.
if everyone agrees with you in abortion,,it will be available in all 50 states. If not, it won’t be available in all 50 states.
I don’t think CT should have an income tax, but not nearly a majority agrees with me, so i don’t get my way. and why should i? who am i to be able to impose my beliefs on others?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device