Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
hilary made herself look deranged, by saying she’s a russian asset with zero evidence.
wdmso, what is your opinion exactly, of Hilary saying that tulsi is a russian asset, while offering zero evidence to support it? Is that OK with you?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Clearly you have no problems with Trump claiming Biden and his son of corruption without evidence by Name ..
But the mere suggestion that Clinton behaved in the same manner your outraged
..In a recent interview, Clinton didn't mention Democratic presidential candidate Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii by name, but said she believes one candidate is "the favorite of the Russians." and because
Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill said, "If the nesting doll fits... somehow its outrageous
Yet Mulvaney Tries to Walk Back Quid Pro Quo Remarks.. yet your not concerned
"Another example of the right suggesting Behavior of the POTUS is the same as a Private Citizen ..
Gabbard’s campaign has been promoted by Russian state-owned media and defended on Twitter by the Russian embassy – support she has refused to disavow.
^^^^^^^ heres some circumstantial evidence ^^^^^^^^^^^