Quote:
Originally Posted by ReelinRod
That's a peculiar phrasing. It demonstrates a profound ignorance of the law.
|
It's an application of the thought process to justify an outcome...or lack of one thereof.
Quote:
|
No matter how you spin it, me proving you to be wrong is not perpetuating the problem of criminal gun use.
|
Ha, OK Jim. Are you dressed all in white as well?
Quote:
You can denigrate my proof as mere cut-n-paste, you can call it spin, but that doesn't change the fact that you are wrong, irreconcilably wrong on the law. It's past time to admit you have no argument that the Constitution or the law supports you or your gun control agenda.
You need to come up with solutions that do not implicate the right to arms . . . Or you need to come clean and admit that you don't give a crap about the Constitution and you would eagerly vote for people who would violate their oaths to uphold it.
|
If the law was so clear there would be no debate. The bigger issue is that the idea of "arms" is not a monolithic thing...yet it's treated as one by some to maintain a divine sensibility intended to kill all progression.
First, you have to admit there's a problem you want to change.