Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
NM
|
I don't know what "NM" means...
"Just the constant lying of meeting w/Russians"
But zero evidence of collusion.
"Correct - "wanted""
Right. Trump Jr wanted to collude with the Russians to get dirt on Hilary. I don't think that's up for debate. It's a horrible lack of judgment.
"Bruce is. He has called it a witch hunt repeatedly"
What the media did with it, was a witch hunt. That's just my opinion. The media stopped being in the hard news business, and entered the "get Trump" business.
Here's a question I keep asking, and I have never seen addressed, not once, anywhere. Were any of the leaked emails that supposedly hurt Hilary in the election, false or doctored? What I mena is, is there any debate about whether or not she was guilty of doing the things that were in those emails?
Because the liberals want me to believe that leaking those emails cost her the election. Fine, let's say I agree with that (which I don't). If honestly revealing her actions cost her the election, then how come NO ONE is asking her why she did the things she did?
Aren't her actions, a bigger story than how we learned about her actions?
I'm not saying ignore the Russian involvement, we need to look into that.