Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
GOPUSA? Really???
The New York Times? Really???
How about dropping the snobbery bit and explain what is wrong with the article?
The initial story was that the video sparked the event and extremists quickly moved in.
Interesting. So, wasn't the supposed initial reaction to the video by "extremists." Or did some regular non-extreme folks somehow just happen to get wind of the video and this somehow sparked an event composed by regular non-extreme folks who wanted to stage a peaceful nicey-nice demonstration which was then "quickly" moved in on by unaware, unprepared, and fully armed "actual" extremists? Really???
That fit with the evidence at the time. Nothing has really contradicted this and the NYT story seems to give it additional credibility.
-spence
|
Amazing how something can be made to "fit with the evidence." Isn't that usually the case when you attempt to create a story of deniable plausibility? Yes, things have really contradicted the "fit with the evidence." But it is apparently useless to hash it out once again since any contradictory "evidence" seems to fall on deaf or unreceptive ears.