Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Well then, you would be wrong as usual, because the Volt didn't come out until December 2010. You can look it up to see who was President at that time...
|
He's not wrong.
Both Bush 41 and Bush 43 signed laws giving tax credits to promote the purchase of electric vehicles.
Bush 43 did indeed sign the 7,500 tax credit into law as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.
Full Text of H.R. 1424 (110th): Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 - GovTrack.us
See Title II section 205.
Then in the spirit of a more constructive forum debate I think you really do owe Paul an apology.
A few data points are missing from the debate over mortgage reductions.
The reason it's a hot topic is that the 5 largest PRIVATE lenders just settled for 26 billion over accusations of improper lending and foreclosure behavior. A good chuck of this money is going to select underwater mortgage holders as compensation for unfair banking practices.
To date Fannie and Freddie have avoided mortgage reductions given the implications of taxpayer money and obviously the potential for abuse.
There certainly is an economic argument that mortgage reductions can be effective to stabilize the market. Some also argue that payment reductions can achieve the same effect.
While I'd agree that what might effectively be a taxpayer subsidy is a slippery slope, given the large number of mortgages held by Fannie and Freddie the taxpayer will end up taking a hit regardless if the situation doesn't improve.
-spence