Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
It won’t have Putin’s
|
And that reply goes directly to the entire "Resistance"mentality. It is your feeling that "it won't have Putin's" support but just like Vindman, you would be unable to articulate an actual legal, factual support for your statement . . . It's all characterizations, sentiments, feelings, all borne out of political agenda.
Ratcliffe repeatedly asked Vindman about how he characterized the call, how he was "concerned" about the call, how he did not think it was "proper" and how those feelings evolved into Vindman's conclusion that the conversation was a "demand". Vindman dissembled and admitted that he didn't "parse his words carefully" and that he's "not an attorney" and that he, "just wrote it the way [he] felt it".
Feelings set this ball rolling and nothing but hearsay has kept it rolling.. . .
Vindman could not describe how the request for assistance was a violation of law or the mutual cooperation treaty between the US and Ukraine that
requires Ukraine to assist and cooperate with the US in criminal investigations when asked.
His disagreement was based in feelings . . . as is your poor excuse of a reply above.