Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Well, at least if you're going to cite a conspiracy theorist you picked a good one.
|
He's very, very good. And he even offers some substance rather than just an easy, drive-by, substanceless, snide comment. The cite is food for thought . . . and actual discussion . . . if thought and discussion are provided.
A bibliography of more "conspiracies" listed by one of the authorities that the article cites:
http://www.nipp.org/publications/dow...les/year-2015/