Quote:
Originally Posted by stripersnipr
LMAO............So Clinton supported the investigation and prosecution of Rostenkowski, right? That must be why he pardoned him.
|
Good God man, now you're mixing your talking points.
Clinton supporting the Rostenkowski's prosecution isn't the question, of course he didn't. But he clearly did allow the system to indict and convict, so one would assume he didn't fire the prosecutor to impeed the investigation as so many would like to think.
If the pardon was ethical is a separate issue.
Quote:
This thread was not intended to defend Bush or prosecute Clinton, it's intent was to point out a double standard that we witness in play by the media everyday. If you dont see it your blind.
You have posted nothing that dispels that common belief.
|
Have you read a thing I've posted, or do you just blindly cut and paste from goptalkingpointsmemo.com?
This entire scandal arose because the Justice Department appears to have misled the US Congress.
It's exploding because the Executive Branch is declaring executive authority to impeed an investigation to see if this is really true.
Would you like me to go back 10 years or so and print to quotes of Clinton's attack dogs, crying foul at his shameless use of executive privelage to limit transparancy? With all that Clinton still allowed some 41 aides to testify under oath!
Your bushbotic GOP gyro-coding has you on your head, and you think everyone else is upside down!
-spence