View Single Post
Old 03-18-2007, 01:33 PM   #14
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swimmer View Post
Wasn't it alledged that they were underperforming? Could that be so? If they are democrats and Bush is in his second term, that means they served six years beyond the norm. Six years on borrowed time. Even in government work thats quite extraordinary.
I believe they were all Bush appointees from his first term. I've read that the performance claims doesn't hold much water...but you have to be wary of the liberal media.

-spence
spence is online now