Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
You assume York's is correct.
As the Trumplicans say "you don't have direct knowledge"
We'll leave common sense out of the discussion, it would ruin your narrative.
|
Again, you employ your slippery sliding technique of shifting from what was said into saying something else that suits you or your narrative or your shadowy amorphous yet somehow in your mind concrete opinion. I didn't say that I assume York's is correct. Nor did I actually assume so. I said that I prefer it. I don't assume much of any conclusion that is being made about what the actual truth is. I simply don't know. I go by the notion that without proof of criminality, innocence is presumed.
Those that make conjectures don't or can't actually know. Except for, in your mind, you.