View Single Post
Old 02-05-2017, 05:07 AM   #5
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Wayne....this judge went beyond the normal scope of his influence...but what he did is within the scope of his powers(seldom used for good reason)....that's fine...but look at his rationale for doing so....

"This emphasis on uniformity was key to Judge Robart’s order. He acknowledged the Trump Administration’s argument that any restraining order should be limited to the two plaintiff states -- Washington and Minnesota. But Judge Robart rejected the request, concluding that a “partial implementation would undermine the constitutional imperative of a uniform Rule of Naturalization, and Congress’s instruction that the immigration laws of the United States should be enforced vigorously and uniformly.”


this is pretty funny considering the fact that Obama and his administration spent the last 8 years picking and choosing which immigration laws they were going to enforce or not enforce....


wonder where this judge was with his broad powers then????


Politico 6/16/12 Obama is relying on federal agencies to ignore, or at least not defend, laws that some of his important supporters — like Hispanic voters and the gay community — don’t like.

“If the president says we’re not going to enforce the law, there’s really nothing anyone can do about it,” University of Pennsylvania constitutional law professor Kermit Roosevelt said. “It’s clearly a political calculation.”

"Sometimes this makes for less-than-ideal policy situations — such as the action we took on immigration — but the president isn’t going to be stonewalled by politics, he will pursue whatever means available to do business on behalf of American people.”

Last edited by scottw; 02-05-2017 at 05:14 AM..
scottw is offline