Quote:
Originally Posted by buckman
[QUOTE
The kook is the biggest factor, you are correct. But please, tell me what's factually incorrect with the following sentence?
The more lethal the weapon, the more kids the kook can kill before the good guys get there.
How is that wrong?
|
your premise that less kids would have died if he didn't illegally access this weapon is hypothetical
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device[/QUOTE]
So why did those cops storm the school with rifles instead of handguns?
Yes, I am hypothesizing. The fact that those cops entered the school with rifles instead of handguns, would seem to support my hypothesis. The cops did not know what they were facing. Yet just about every one of them chose a rifle instead of a pistol? Why?
If a rifle provides no tactical advantage over a handgun, why did they all have rifles?