[Jim in CT]

I was rooting for this woman after reading her credentials, then of course the truth comes out.

She claimed she can't define what a woman is, because she's not a biologist. Such a stupid, woke answer. At least she went on record as conceding that sex is a biological construct (which it obviously is), and not a social construct.

Then Ted Cruz asked her why she occasionally slashed sentences for those involved with child pornography, #^&#^&#^&#^& Durbin wouldn't let her answer. When the democrats are afraid of america hearing her answer, we should ask why that is.

Then, most importantly, we learn that she had ruled the pro life groups could not rally in front of abortion clinics. She ruled that the First Amendment does not apply to pro life Americans. She's on record as having ignored the constitution in favor of political outcomes she personally wants. That's the worst possible kind of judge. This is exactly why the statue of Lady Justice at every courthouse, has a blindfold. Judges have to be able to set aside their personal political agenda, and abide only by what the constitution says. This isn't a judge, she's a liberal activist.

If the Klan can hold peaceful but offensive rallies, if the Westboro Baptist Church can chant "thank god for dead soldiers" at military funerals, if BLM can moronically claim that cops are a bunch of racist assassins, then pro life groups can also exercise their rights to assembly and free speech.

But not according to this totalitarian jerk. There is no constitutional right to never be offended.