Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Seems you guys need to see and understand why the courts are are ruling against all theses NEW laws most enacted primary by republican in those states ..
or is your answer going to be the same as all your other answers it is the liberal and progressive Judges Fault
Seems you need to see and understand why the courts are ruling the way they do. Oh wait, however courts rule, for you that's just the way it is and is supposed to be. No need for you to question court rulings.
Your model of citizenship for a free civil society is frightening.
I love the fantasy... these laws are to protect the voting process ...
The proposed laws which were struck down were designed to protect the voting process. Requiring ID, for instance, is designed to protect the voting process. But if some Judge has a different opinion, a different agenda, then the laws ain't no good.
Leave the process up to a few Judges. Scary.
to use your guys need for past history theses laws where fine 15 ,20 ,30 even 60 years ago .. but now there not  |
So past history is good if it is not more than 60 years old. Anything over 60 years ago is no good. If its less than 60 years ago, it is written in temporary stone and must not be touched.
A lot happened in those 60 years that needed fixing. So long as any change is Constitutional, and the people approve, no Judge should have the power to disapprove. However, when Judges rule by philosophical or personal agenda, as Progressive Judges do, then neither Congress nor The People have their Constitutional right to make necessary adjustments to political process.
You don't like that same old argument. But it is the only argument which will protect you and the rest of us from despotisms, even the ones that promise nice sounding things.
Leaving the power in the hands of a few judges who do not respect the overall Constitutional process to decide what protects the voting process, is the surest way of achieving a corrupted voting process.