Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The article makes no assertion that donations resulted in access, only that some people she met with had or were associated with someone who had made a donation previously. There still is no evidence anyone was given access because of their donations in fact the email leak shows the opposite.
That they led the story by misrepresenting the entire article is really sloppy journalism.
|
Spence, there is an email from a foundation employee to Hilary's secstate email. In it, the foundation employee says that the prince of Bahrain (who gave $32million to the foundation) is "a good friend of ours". Coincidentally, after this email, Hilary met with the guy and sold him weapons.
Also, Weiner's wife was a paid employee of the State Dept, and the foundation, at the same time.
There is no email where Hilary says that you have to pay to get access to her. But there is certainly the appearance, once again, of impropriety.
And again, there is no earthly reason why foreign donations are acceptable when she was secstate, but inappropriate as POTUS. Secstate is a very powerful position, maybe you can take high school civics and bone up on that.