Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
Cherynobyl and Fukushima have certainly improved our quality of living.... 
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
I didn't say nuclear is perfect. I said that according to a guy that TIME called a hero of the planet, nuclear is "better" than wind/solar. Not perfect, but better. Less intrusive. Less damaging.
Solar panels would require a massive amount of space to put the panels (you see Nebe, when you build things like solar panels, they have to be put somewhere, we can't just stack them on top of each other), which would require killing god knows how any animals.
You don't understand the difference between the words "perfect", and "better". That's your issue.
Read the article. Tell me why he's wrong. "I don't like his conclusions", doesn't make them wrong.