Quote:
Originally Posted by justplugit
What evidence was that and would it have proved him guilty without a reasonable doubt?
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The only evidence presented that he acted in self defense was that he wasn't winning the fight. To assume that alone means he was jumped is absurd, the prosecution simply dropped the ball.
How do they say, he who wins the war gets to write the history?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
you didn't answer the question