Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
So she wrote 2 books She wrote a 1,000 page book. She documented the evidence for her opinions or conclusions in her book.
She came to conclusions via the evidence just as you did when you categorically stated that Epstein committed suicide. You provided statistics that showed "So guess what Jeff’s death by suicide in a jail cell."
And you claimed that the stats you showed made it more plausible that he committed suicide. Do you have any stats that show how many times a guard fell asleep during suicide watch? Or how many times an alarm mechanism failed during suicide watch? Or how many times an inmate hung himself from a height shorter than his height? Or how many times or percentages all three of those things happened at the same time? If that trio of events is rare or never, does that make it more plausible that he committed suicide rather than that it was made to look like a suicide.
You are correct Her book her facts and her opinions
"Her" facts were mostly public record. Some needed further research. She didn't make them up.
That fit what you have always believed
I haven't always believed what I believe now.
I used to believe that the federal government would, as a good workforce should and would do, faithfully execute its duties and do what is in our best interest against those and that which would harm us or impinge on our rights.
Then I was made aware of competing factional interests in our government. One which, historically and currently wanted to "transform" our system from one that protected our constitutional unalienable individual rights against a tyrannical central power into a centralized one in which we could depend on to give us the rights it created ad hoc and to ultimately provide for our collective needs-- versus a factional interest that claimed to Protect our original constitutional rights.
Then I came to learn that the latter constitutionalist faction was also chipping away at our Constitution, but at a slower rate.
I once had a complete trust that in the wars we faught we were totally justified and were the righteous ones. I once supported Bush's Iraq war, but have been convinced otherwise. I have a more jaundiced eye now regarding any calls for war. Though, no doubt, a war may well be justified and necessary.
I had faith in our federal intel and criminal agencies, but have learned that they, like all idealistically created institutions, can slowly rot due to scoundrels within them, for whatever reason, from financial to partisan. And I am wary of the unconstitutional power given to all the federal regulatory agencies, especially as they have tremendously shifted power from the states to the federal government and greatly enhanced our march to the one state absolute power of a centralized federal government.
Among so many changes of what I believe in so many areas of my life.
What section would her books be in
History science fiction non fiction
Fiction or opinions
Depends on the book store. Not long ago I went to a Barnes and Noble store to buy some Thomas Sowell books. The shelves were full of lots of fluffy, woke, popular cultural economic and history books, as well as various classically accepted or oriented ones. But still relevant and productive books by the iconic and influental conservative leaning Thomas Sowell--none. But I could order them if I wished. That is, I guess, they are all still in print and selling well, but not good enough to stock, at least at that Barnes and Noble.
Here are some reviewers
One Nation Under Blackmail" you'll understand that rogue elements (usually at the top) of the Office of Naval Intelligence, CIA (formerly OSS), FBIhave been closely cooperating since WW2 with the National Crime Syndicate (Jewish and Italian) in the realm of drugs, gun-running, money laundering, human trafficking and other rackets. Epstein was a CIA and Mossad asset, just a cog in the wheel, one of many working on financial scams and procuring sexual blackmail against major politicians of both wings of the monoparty. Alas, Trump was also a frequent visitor to Epstein's island, as were the Clintons, George Mitchell, Bill Richardson, Dershowitz, Bill Gates and many more. Ghislaine Maxwell's father Robert, the media mogul, before his suspicious death, managed to tie together Yakuza, Triads, Tongs, Russian Mafia, American Mafia and the various intelligence agencies of the world in a gigantic web of corruption. It is known as the Mega Group.
Wow since ww2 it took a 32 year old from Chile to expose this lol
You got something against Chile or 32 year olds?
Are you a racist ageist? She was born in the USA and is still an American citizen. And very bright, wise, and productive--for a 32 year old from Chile.
And a negative review
The first chapter really hyped up a whole conspiracy. The rest of the book really reached for some connections that only seem to be there if you ignore all logic and reasoning. Do your own research, and you'll probably come to a vastly different conclusion
She’s targeting a small base telling them exactly what they want to hear
Which in their minds give them the validation that what they think is correct and how the world is it’s a deep state Cabal
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
If she wanted to earn enough money to make a decent living, or to make it worthwhile for her time and effort spent, she wouldn't put out the time and energy it takes to write a thousand pages of well researched dense copy as in the book she wrote just so she could sell enough copies to a bunch of schmucks. That kind of effort and dedication smacks more of doing it for love, truth, and honor, than it does for getting validation from a small base of narrow minds.
She wrote it for the citizens of this country who don't know what she envisions as coming if we don't pay attention to what is fairly obvious re the powers that be, here and worldwide, and the "cooperation" among those powers for more gain and more power, and what the cost will be to the rest of us not only in terms of our freedoms and well-being, but in terms of our basic humanity.
As a brief summation and example of how we can be persuaded without force to surrender our freedoms and our humanity, let us look at what is rapidly unfolding before our eyes. How does the worldwide, instigated here, "cabal" of global central power achieve its rise to total power. The most efficient step is to strip us of notions of personal freedom, of thoughts that there are any absolutes or any permanence or such immutable things as "human nature."
Even make words and meanings flexible, changeable at whim in order to, as Orwell showed, control thought. Once you've made words flexible and unpredictable in meaning, just ban them by censoring speech in social and political platforms--stop ideas from proliferating--call them mis or disinformation.
Make all things possible through science. You don't need to remain a gender given at birth. You can choose (ah, freedom) a gender and make it so simply by claiming it. And divesting yourself of various natural gender markers by scientific procedures or ingestion of various pharmaceuticals. Under this manufactured creation of a gender, the notion of gender is destroyed, eliminated. It makes it impossible to answer the question "what is a woman?"--Apparently, whatever you want it to be. And that inspires the question, why do you care about something that doesn't actually exist? Forgetaboutit.
Make it so that you are not significant. That you exist simply as a thought, a wish, an "identity" that has no bounds nor fixed meaningful definition. Strip you of the necessity to make and assure your own responsible way in your momentary frightful existence--have it programmed by the beneficent power of experts whose mission is to give you a stressless existence of perpetual pleasure not encumbered by demanding traditions, customs, perturbing questions of why and how, and so forth, so long as you do the necessary and easy work prescribed for you in order to maintain the order needed for those who are owners of your would be "society." They, of course, will need no chips inserted in their heads. They may have to endure occasional stress in order to maintain their power--that is, they can maintain a semblance of actual humanity as we know it.
Sure, sounds like a really crazy conspiracy theory. Quite like Huxley's
Brave New World.
When that book was published, not that very long ago, it was not considered a conspiracy theory. Of course, at that time, the use of the label "conspiracy theory" as a means to suppress or "debunk" opposing views was not in use.
No, at that time it was considered a very thoughtful, insightful, book that proposed a serious challenge to what could become the dehumanization of the world's population into basically roboticized humanoids serving as the well-kept slave workforce of the privileged few. The few who would still have the stress and meaningfulness of maintaining power--along with the meaningful privilege of possessing not only the burden of being human, but as well the boundless satisfactions of creative, responsible, powerful, human existence.
There is a similar possibility posed by Whitney Webb in her book if we don't heed some very obvious direction we are taking, and if we quietly succumb to the siren call of pleasure and convenience in store for the reduced population--oh yeah, forgot, reduce the population to a more easily manageable size that will be needed to sustain whoever gains the power to rule in the global "new world order" by such means as encouraging, funding, imposing the spread of abortion, promoting the lgbtq+ agendas thus encouraging (even demanding/enforcing by various anti-discriminatory laws) more and more to join those who don't naturally produce new people.
At least discuss the possibilities. Even show how wonderful it can be and not to worry.