07-08-2022, 08:46 AM
|
#29
|
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,069
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Leading historical societies conclude that the “misrepresentations” in Dobbs “are now enshrined in a text that becomes authoritative for legal reference and citation in the future.” But scholars and lawyers should agree never to cite this fake “history.”
https://www.historians.org/Documents...ment_final.pdf
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Well, I think the radical SCOTUS shouldn’t just invent history to justify overturning a long-standing decision.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|