View Single Post
Old 12-07-2015, 11:09 AM   #35
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe View Post
i wouldn't say the japanese casualties were a genocide as every one of those guys fought to the death. anyone who surrendered was taken prisoner. The difference between that situation and this situation is that not every middle eastern muslim poses a death threat to you or me, unless you are a god fearing scared of anyone who isn't like you isolationist fascist and want to irradiate the threat completely.

The swede is not wrong on paper, but is fundamentally morally wrong. I bet he is also a white supremacist and jerks off to midget porn while wearing women's underwear.
"i wouldn't say the japanese casualties were a genocide as every one of those guys fought to the death"

Do you have any idea how many Japanese civilians were killed bu the napalm bombing, and the atomic weapons, that we used? Hundreds of thousands. Many were women and children who wanted nothing to do with the war. Your grandfather was a part of that effort.

We did that, becaise the Japanese forced us to do it. If they stopped murdering, raping, and eating everyone in their path, we would have been more than happy to lay down our arms. But they wouldn't stop.

When one side wages war, particularly barnaric war like the Japanese and ISIS are doing, the only way to stop them is to get almost as ugly as they are. That's a horrible thing. I don't like it, i hate it. But it's reality.

And Islamic jihadists aren't equally committed to fightring to the death? How many have surrendered?

"The difference between that situation and this situation is that not every middle eastern muslim poses a death threat to you or me"

That does NOT make a distinction betweed WWII and th ewar with teror. As I said, we killed hundreds of thousands of Japanese women and babies who posed no direct threat to anyone. But th eonly way to end th ewar, was to annihilate centers of Japanese industry, which were in civilian areas. So we did it. We didn't like it. We did it because they forced us to do it.

"The swede is not wrong on paper, but is fundamentally morally wrong. I bet he is also a white supremacist "

There we go!! I admit everything he said was correct, but because I don't like what his truthful statements mean, he must be a racist! He must be dismissed, because otherwise I might have to admit he has a point, and I'm too close-minded to ever do that!

Pathetic.
Jim in CT is offline