Been awhile I've since been here and now I know why.261 responses later and I'm dumbfounded into what this thread has become.
My initial post:
Quote:
This is direct quote from her after her '96 Balkans visit:
"I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."
We now know that the above statement was a complete and total LIE.
And we're supposed to except what she said during the Benghazi hearings as truth?That would be like handing a crack-head a 20 spot and he/she promises to spend the money on food.How can anything this woman says be trusted?
|
Next post by Spence:
Quote:
I'm not sure that really matters. A lot of fairly honest people are guilty of sensationalizing things along the way. It would be more disconcerting if it was important...
We didn't really learn that much new in the Clinton testimony. It's been investigated to death...
|
The woman is a complete and total liar,of course it matters.And yes we've actually learned much.How do you "sensationalize" a combat experience?
"Its been investigated to death".Really,has it?So why is it still under investigation to this day?Don't answer its a rhetorical question...SHE LIED!!!!!