Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Thanks for citing a very neutral source. I'd note his conviction was considered an open and shut case.
|
You mean a "neutral" source such as The Washington Post? Like this one:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.aded0574b100
Would you care to dispute the article rather than throw a demeaning label at it?
It seems, per the article, that his conviction was prematurely or fraudulently opened and shut. Like a lot of fraudulent convictions are.
I don't know of any major sources that are "neutral." So, unlike you, I evaluate what a source actually says, rather than bitching about the source's lack of neutrality.
However, I can see how it would be far more convenient to kill the messenger than to read the message. The only thing that might suffer from that is something that is as minor as the truth.