Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
for the 4th time now, tell us why it’s wrong for Du up to assume political motivations when that hasn’t been established, but totally ok when everyone to the left does it with this case
“information and actual facts” s a tad vague. If the police have concluded Mr Pelosi was attacked purely for political reasons, can you share a link to that? I can’t don’t it anywhere.
|
It seems political but then maybe Depage wanted to find out where Nancy got her hair done????
Under questioning, Mr DePape allegedly told San Francisco police officers that he wanted to hold Ms Pelosi hostage, interrogate her, and injure her if she "lied".
"DePape articulated [that] he viewed Nancy as the 'leader of the pack' of lies told by the Democratic Party," the FBI's complaint says. "If Nancy were to tell DePape the 'truth,' he would let her go, and if she 'lied,'he was going to break 'her kneecaps'....
"DePape also later explained that by breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into Congress, which would show other members of Congress there were consequences to actions."
He allegedly added that he wanted to use Ms Pelosi to lure in another person, though the FBI document does not say who.
When Mr DePape realised that Mr Pelosi had called the police, he allegedly decided to stand his ground. "DePape explained that he did not leave after Pelosi’s call because, much like the American founding fathers with the British, he was fighting against tyranny without the option of surrender," the FBI said.
The FBI agent concluded: "The facts of the investigation to date reveal that DePape was prepared to detain and injure Speaker Pelosi when he entered the Pelosi residence in the early morning of October 28, 2022. DePape had zip ties, tape, rope, and at least one hammer with him that morning."
Ms Jenkins likewise said: "It appears, based on his statements and comments that were made in that house during his encounter with Mr Pelosi, that this was politically motivated.