|
i find Paul S o be one of the more thoughtful
left leaning folks here, i’m genuinely interested in his take. not on the wall, but on the sanctuary policy of refusing to alert ICE when illegals commit additional
crimes after they are here.
i believe even sanctuary cities will
alert ICE if an illegal commits a violent felony. but the two DUIs plus other warrants (?) are harmless enough that in CA, state law prohibits local
law enforcement from alerting ICE to deport. that policy appears to have contributed mightily to this outcome.
i don’t see the upside to it. i mean cars kill more people than illegals, but i don’t want cars outlawed, because cars add value to our lives. i don’t see the value in telling all
the illegals thatvcwrtain places will allow them
to commit additional crimes without alerting ICE. obviously illegals who are criminals will choose to settle in these places, exposing the law abiding citizens to more crime.
what’s the upside?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|