Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Jim, we've discussed this before. The State Department was gathering information in parallel from different sources that didn't require classification.
Sen. Feinstein has also confirmed that no emails were marked top secret.
What will be interesting is that the IG was supposed to be reviewing email practices from the last 5 Secretaries of State.
|
"The State Department was gathering information in parallel from different sources that didn't require classification."
The State Dept is entitled to gather its own intelligence, and to classify data as it sees fit. But how do you know that's what too kplace, in the case of these 2 emails? Other than taking her word for it, what else you got?
"Sen. Feinstein has also confirmed that no emails were marked top secret."
How does she know?
Let's let the investigation pan out, how about that?
According to you, everyone who defends her is credible, everyone who hints she acted improperly, is a partisan hack, including Obama's IG. We get it.
"What will be interesting is that the IG was supposed to be reviewing email practices from the last 5 Secretaries of State"
yes, that will be interesting.
Spence, what of her response to the question, "did you wipe the server?", and she said "what, you mean with a cloth?" Is that a presidential answer to a fair question?