Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » Political Threads

Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-24-2018, 06:19 AM   #1
wdmso
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,197
Where are your papers

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/06/23/u...nts/index.html

Border patrol agents are stopping people on highways in New England to check their citizenship


More hysteria from the left ..... 11 hour check point's



let not compare this to a sobriety check point they are announced.. but some one will say they are no different
wdmso is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 06:28 AM   #2
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,435
If you aren’t doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear. Your comparison of this to Nazi germany is absurd, and it’s why trump won.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 06:45 AM   #3
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Spence said it's not illegal to be here illegally so I don't know what all the fuss is about...
scottw is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 06:46 AM   #4
wdmso
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
If you aren’t doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear. Your comparison of this to Nazi germany is absurd, and it’s why trump won.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Since when have your rights to freedom of movement been based on the requirement you need to prove your not doing anything wrong... but if this was a weapons check you would be singing a different tune ..... Nazi Germany became they way it was with people who think like you and accept these actions as a good party member
wdmso is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 07:37 AM   #5
Sea Dangles
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Sea Dangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
Did you hear about the landscaping company in Ohio that ice busted?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Sea Dangles is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 07:52 AM   #6
Nebe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Nebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,591
Yesterday cops were all over the place in south county yesterday.

Are we all enjoying our liberty, persuit of happiness and freedom?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Nebe is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 08:01 AM   #7
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso View Post
Since when have your rights to freedom of movement been based on the requirement you need to prove your not doing anything wrong... but if this was a weapons check you would be singing a different tune ..... Nazi Germany became they way it was with people who think like you and accept these actions as a good party member
I’ve been stopped at checks for seat belts, Dui checks, registration checks, emissions checks. I think it’s well established that these are legal and pursuint to public safety. You sound like an antifa spokesman.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 08:02 AM   #8
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe View Post
Yesterday cops were all over the place in south county yesterday.

Are we all enjoying our liberty, persuit of happiness and freedom?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
They’re risking their lives for you. Did it infringe on your freedoms?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 09:01 AM   #9
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,134
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso View Post
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/06/23/u...nts/index.html

Border patrol agents are stopping people on highways in New England to check their citizenship


More hysteria from the left ..... 11 hour check point's



let not compare this to a sobriety check point they are announced.. but some one will say they are no different
What is your opinion? Is this Trump's fault? Or is this a government program run amok, independent of Trump? Or is it an agency doing its job?

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 09:11 AM   #10
Slipknot
Super Moderator
iTrader: (0)
 
Slipknot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middleboro MA
Posts: 17,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso View Post
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/06/23/u...nts/index.html

Border patrol agents are stopping people on highways in New England to check their citizenship


More hysteria from the left ..... 11 hour check point's



let not compare this to a sobriety check point they are announced.. but some one will say they are no different
This is not new
It has been happening for quite a while as it also happens on the southern border inland also.

I find it wrong as a Libertarian and not a left vs right issue but you are entitled to your opinion to frame it however you choose.

It is just as wrong as sobriety checks since you brought it up. Both of these stops you should be allowed to move passed without speaking or even opening your window.

There should be specific instructions given to all involved in these type of blocks and if they are not legally followed by some, they should be reprimanded accordingly.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The United States Constitution does not exist to grant you rights; those rights are inherent within you. Rather it exists to frame a limited government so that those natural rights can be exercised freely.

1984 was a warning, not a guidebook!

It's time more people spoke up with the truth. Every time we let a leftist lie go uncorrected, the commies get stronger.
Slipknot is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 03:22 PM   #11
wdmso
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,197
@realDonaldTrump
Follow Follow @realDonaldTrump
More
We cannot allow all of these people to invade our Country. When somebody comes in, we must immediately, with no Judges or Court Cases, bring them back from where they came. Our system is a mockery to good immigration policy and Law and Order. Most children come without parents...


its all part of his bigger plan ... whos next once he has saved us from the invasion Liberals , elites , the educated . his political opponents his critics ....
wdmso is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 03:41 PM   #12
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso View Post
@realDonaldTrump
Follow Follow @realDonaldTrump
More
We cannot allow all of these people to invade our Country. When somebody comes in, we must immediately, with no Judges or Court Cases, bring them back from where they came. Our system is a mockery to good immigration policy and Law and Order. Most children come without parents...


its all part of his bigger plan ... whos next once he has saved us from the invasion Liberals , elites , the educated . his political opponents his critics ....
Calm down we still have the constitution.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 03:54 PM   #13
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
Calm down we still have the constitution.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/imm...-trial-n886141

For how long?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
spence is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 06:15 PM   #14
PaulS
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
PaulS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,242
President Trump doesn't seem to understand that the fifth and Fourteenth Amendment apply to all people in the u.s. whether year legally or not
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
PaulS is online now  
Old 06-24-2018, 06:53 PM   #15
Sea Dangles
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Sea Dangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS View Post
President Trump doesn't seem to understand that the fifth and Fourteenth Amendment apply to all people in the u.s. whether year legally or not
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Paul, can you translate for those of us who happen to speak English?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
Sea Dangles is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 07:29 PM   #16
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles View Post
Paul, can you translate for those of us who happen to speak English?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Really? You aren't capable of figuring out the meaning of the typo?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 08:00 PM   #17
Sea Dangles
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Sea Dangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
Would you rather challenge me than correct your error?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Sea Dangles is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 08:03 PM   #18
PaulS
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
PaulS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by zimmy View Post
Really? You aren't capable of figuring out the meaning of the typo?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
I usually just ignore him as he really doesn't have anything to add
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
PaulS is online now  
Old 06-24-2018, 08:07 PM   #19
Sea Dangles
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Sea Dangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
Do you honestly feel you are making a contribution that is noteworthy?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Sea Dangles is offline  
Old 06-24-2018, 08:11 PM   #20
PaulS
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
PaulS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,242
As I said
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
PaulS is online now  
Old 06-24-2018, 08:13 PM   #21
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS View Post
President Trump doesn't seem to understand that the fifth and Fourteenth Amendment apply to all people in the u.s. whether year legally or not
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The Fifth Amendment stipulates some exceptions, including matters of public danger which surely arises with a massive influx of illegal aliens. And the Amendment specifically applies to capital or otherwise infamous crimes. It doesn't apply to misdemeanors.

The Fourteenth Amendment applies to born or naturalized citizens or to "any person within its jurisdiction". Illegal aliens would be under the jurisdiction of their home country, the country to which they are citizens. Not being under the jurisdiction of the U.S, except as illegally being here "equal protection of the laws" would not fully apply to them. They do not have equal access to our system. Nor do they have superior privileges to actual citizens. If citizens can be separated from their children when being detained, certainly illegal aliens can.
detbuch is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 05:45 AM   #22
wdmso
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,197
The Trump administration last week opened a trade investigation into vehicle imports, which could result in a 25 percent tariff on cars on the same “national security” grounds


the Trump catch all “national security” grounds


Trump’s unprecedented disregard for the role of Congress is particularly evident in the administration’s trade investigations under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which grants the president broad powers to “adjust” imports to prevent threats to “national security.”

But we still have the constitution (you have to believe in it 1st Trumps not looking like he does unless it suites him)
wdmso is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 07:54 AM   #23
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso View Post
The Trump administration last week opened a trade investigation into vehicle imports, which could result in a 25 percent tariff on cars on the same “national security” grounds


the Trump catch all “national security” grounds


Trump’s unprecedented disregard for the role of Congress is particularly evident in the administration’s trade investigations under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which grants the president broad powers to “adjust” imports to prevent threats to “national security.”

But we still have the constitution (you have to believe in it 1st Trumps not looking like he does unless it suites him)
Not sure what your point is in this post. But tinkering with the Constitution by Progressive "interpretation" of it in the way that it suits judges and politicians has been going on for a century. In that time, the piling on of bad precedent as well as destructive novel interpretations is now beginning to bite the azz of the Progressives, as warned that it would, by giving their enemies the phony legal ammunition to do what the Constitution should prevent. From what you've said in several previous posts, I don't understand your objection to "interpreting" in ways that suit the interpreter.
detbuch is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 08:01 AM   #24
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,134
Blog Entries: 1
Wayne - I am still looking forward to your answer re: What is your opinion? Is this Trump's fault? Or is this a government program run amok, independent of Trump? Or is it an agency doing its job?





Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch View Post
The Fifth Amendment stipulates some exceptions, including matters of public danger which surely arises with a massive influx of illegal aliens. And the Amendment specifically applies to capital or otherwise infamous crimes. It doesn't apply to misdemeanors.

The Fourteenth Amendment applies to born or naturalized citizens or to "any person within its jurisdiction". Illegal aliens would be under the jurisdiction of their home country, the country to which they are citizens. Not being under the jurisdiction of the U.S, except as illegally being here "equal protection of the laws" would not fully apply to them. They do not have equal access to our system. Nor do they have superior privileges to actual citizens. If citizens can be separated from their children when being detained, certainly illegal aliens can.

The Fourteenth does apply most standards to illegal aliens. While they do not get all rights they do get equal protection. But you are correct, they should not get superior protection.

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 08:34 AM   #25
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR View Post
The Fourteenth does apply most standards to illegal aliens. While they do not get all rights they do get equal protection. But you are correct, they should not get superior protection.
I agree with your stipulation of "most" standards. Which is why I said "'equal protection of the laws' would not fully apply to them."

But are illegals "under the jurisdiction" of the U.S. government?

The way the Amendment is written does not say they are. It starts "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." Thus CITIZENS are under the jurisdiction of our State and Federal governments. Illegal aliens are subject to the jurisdiction of the country in which they are citizens.

The last sentence in section 1 of the Amendment says "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Last edited by detbuch; 06-25-2018 at 08:40 AM..
detbuch is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 09:14 AM   #26
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch View Post
The way the Amendment is written does not say they are. It starts "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." Thus CITIZENS are under the jurisdiction of our State and Federal governments. Illegal aliens are subject to the jurisdiction of the country in which they are citizens.

The last sentence in section 1 of the Amendment says "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
How the Amendment is written is less important than how the courts have found...in which case they have found that due process is entitled for undocumented immigrants.
spence is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 09:26 AM   #27
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
How the Amendment is written is less important than how the courts have found...in which case they have found that due process is entitled for undocumented immigrants.
And therein lies the heart of Progressive jurisprudence. In essence, what the Constitution says is irrelevant. What the Judges say is what counts. Spence, why would you be concerned, as you've implied, about how long the Constitution exists? For you it's the Judges that matter. There doesn't seem to be any danger of the Judges disappearing. Quite the contrary, they are stronger and more important than ever. Long live the Judges. Who needs the Constitution?
detbuch is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 09:27 AM   #28
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch View Post
And therein lies the heart of Progressive jurisprudence. In essence, what the Constitution says is irrelevant. What the Judges say is what counts. Spence, why would you be concerned, as you've implied, about how long the Constitution exists? For you it's the Judges that matter. There doesn't seem to be any danger of the Judges disappearing. Quite the contrary, they are stronger and more important than ever. Long live the Judges. Who needs the Constitution?
Not progressive jurisprudence just common sense.
spence is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 10:10 AM   #29
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
due process is entitled for undocumented immigrants.
why do they need due process if they aren't doing anything wrong?
scottw is offline  
Old 06-25-2018, 05:53 PM   #30
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,688
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
Not progressive jurisprudence just common sense.
Common sense would dictate that Judges should interpret and apply the law as it is written, not as they choose.
detbuch is offline  
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com