Kim Jong Il - Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

UserRemoved1 · 10-09-2006, 05:03 AM

I'm not one for political threads but I feel it necessary to make a comment. Kim you little impotent %$%$%$%$ I hope they carpet bomb you and your country. There was no reason to do what you did. I hope they shut off EVERY frickin dollar to your country and you eat your own toenails out of desperation.

rant off/

What a sorry world we live in. I feel bad for what my kids have inherited

stiff tip · 10-09-2006, 06:14 AM

here we go . there aint enouph bad chit happening, now what??? every body stay carm

MrHunters · 10-09-2006, 06:22 AM

this is not going to be good. im pretty sure its going to be NK against the world though.

On a funnier note... when i first read the thread i didnt have the sleeping out of my eyes and I thought it said king kong II

fishsmith · 10-09-2006, 06:44 AM

What will the united nations do?
My guess is send a letter of concern.

spence · 10-09-2006, 07:50 AM

It's more than likely they'll face sanctions over this. If China is pissed, and they are then there isn't going to be much opposition.

Look where a policy of tough talk but no action has got us?

-spence

JohnR · 10-09-2006, 07:59 AM

Welcome the party that rocks on the edge of the abyss....

I feel most sorry for the S Koreans and the Japanese. The "Dear Leader" might be stupid enough to kick off there. Wonder if the Chinese will continue to do not much...

Nebe · 10-09-2006, 08:09 AM

IMO this is just a ploy to recieve more aid with the promise of ending further tests. yeeaahh right

BigBo · 10-09-2006, 08:25 AM

Probably a ploy to get Madeline Albrighte back in the sack. Maybe Mr. Clinton would like in on that action too. Just like old times.

fishpoopoo · 10-09-2006, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spence

It's more than likely they'll face sanctions over this. If China is pissed, and they are then there isn't going to be much opposition.

Look where a policy of tough talk but no action has got us?

-spence

what fulthel sanctions courd nk possibry endule?

nobody can tlaver thele, they ale arleady on de minimus rife suppolt flom china and lussia.

spence · 10-09-2006, 09:01 AM

If there are only two roads in...easier then to cut a lifeline.

I'm not saying sanctions are the trick here either, this is a very complicated problem...and the little guy is holding most of the cards.

-spence

Skip N · 10-09-2006, 09:26 AM

Japan and South Korea will take action if NK decides to keep testing nukes. They will take the lead if military action needs to be taken, and the US will be there to help. But i dont believe the US wil be the first one to fire shots, we'll leave that up to Japan and SK. They'll gladly take care of North Korea if needed!

Little Kim needs to know the world will NOT tolerate this BS. But please dont leave this issue for the UN to figure out

UserRemoved1 · 10-09-2006, 09:31 AM

The massive human casualty rate aside I don't know why all these countries don't just stop the $$ aid and let them suffer. Once people start having nothing to eat they will revolt and this guy will be eaten alive like a Thanksgiving dinner.

Why these guys had to shoot off a nuke is beyond my comprehension. Just like the rockets on July4 it's doing nothing but adding to the already rapid destruction of the world and it's resources. They stomp their feet because we won't support them and put food in their mouths? %$%$%$%$ them.

Impotent little %$%$%$%$ that wears pants that are 7 " too long and has a 10,000 volume porn collection so he can pleasure himself while he takes viagra.

Sad really sad.

Karl F · 10-09-2006, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bassturbed

what fulthel sanctions courd nk possibry endule?

nobody can tlaver thele, they ale arleady on de minimus rife suppolt flom china and lussia.

you one funny rittle plick

Skitterpop · 10-09-2006, 09:54 AM

if I`m being discussed on a Striped Bass fishing site in America

Like I said....

JohnR · 10-09-2006, 10:32 AM

SK would be hard pressed to go offensive with NK - not for military capability reasons as they are in decent shape and can roll back most if not all that Kim can send south. The major problem for SK is that Seoul is already in artilery / MLRS and easy short range missile / SCUD range from NK. While shelling and the ability to put astonomical amounts of shells into the city would certainly suck and have a disasterous effect on Seoul, chemical / biological tipped missiles lobbed into Seoul could kill hundreds of thousands to millions of South Koreans.

Japan could preemptively strike NK with less fear of retaliation. NK has no conventional systems that can realistically penetrate Japan even of they could reach it and the vast majority cannot. The only NK systems that could reach Japan are their rockets which may or may not work and may or may not have NBC capability. Some of which Japan could possibly intercept and possible mitigate effects on.

Still Japan kicking off against NK could anger China (lots of tension lately) and could trigger other other responses in the region. Especially if they were to target and damage nuclear facilities that could impact Chinese and Russian areas that border on / near NK...

If we kick off there is the good possbility of NK going for broke against SK and even have China interceed on NK's behalf.... Pretty muddled picture and now the "Dear Bastard" has confirmed he can toast off a nuke (at least in a test setting)...

UserRemoved1 · 10-09-2006, 11:46 AM

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...10-09-10-58-48

fishpoopoo · 10-09-2006, 11:51 AM

all joking asides, UN action is probable now that the next un secretary will be ... a South Korean.

Skip N · 10-09-2006, 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bassturbed

all joking asides, UN action is probable now that the next un secretary will be ... a South Korean.

haha sweet! About time we got a new leader of the UN. Kofi was freakin useless. Hopefully this guy will be a little better.

fishpoopoo · 10-09-2006, 12:41 PM

wow, this thread is making me hungry.

got any good fido recipes?

http://www.deliciousdogs.com

UserRemoved1 · 10-09-2006, 12:54 PM

weewee u are a sick bastid

fishpoopoo · 10-09-2006, 01:08 PM

woof!

Flaptail · 10-09-2006, 04:13 PM

With only a few (if that) nuclear warheads and/or bombs in thier arsenal and given that, except for most of the military and government high party officials, are near starvation, there is no petroleum resources for the people again reserved for the military and without a stable source for Kim's fetish for western cartoons ( I hear he loves Bugs Bunny). I believe this is a feint for garnering aid from countries like Iran, Syria, China Cuba (yeah right sure) Venezuela. Boast big, like you got a pair of giant steel nutz and play to the heartstrings of the leftist goverments around the world because you cannot solve your problems internally.

wheresmy50 · 10-09-2006, 05:01 PM

Not to be pessimistic, but did WWIII just start? If not, at what point has it?

Maybe the worst thing about this isn't what NK might do. After all, we know where they sleep and the guys in the subs would avenge our deaths many times over. The problem is they are poor beyond poor and sactions will only make that worse. So, with that said, what's stopping them from selling their toys to a nut without a nation? Someone with no capitol to target has a lot less to lose.

Abandon all hope in the UN. If anyone does anything, you can bet it won't be the UN.

riverrat55 · 10-09-2006, 07:01 PM

WTF to we care if NK has nuclear weapons or in the process
of developing nuclear weapons?
Would we hear anything if one of our allies(say SK) had tested and
developed nuclear weapons?
We are told that 7 nations have nuclear weapons?
How do we know for sure that is true?
Maybe some of our allies like S. Africa and Saudi Arabia
have them too!
If we feel threatened by this then the U.N. is our recourse!
We can not act on our own!

Skip N · 10-09-2006, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by riverrat55

WTF to we care if NK has nuclear weapons or in the process
of developing nuclear weapons?
Would we hear anything if one of our allies(say SK) had tested and
developed nuclear weapons?
We are told that 7 nations have nuclear weapons?
How do we know for sure that is true?
Maybe some of our allies like S. Africa and Saudi Arabia
have them too!
If we feel threatened by this then the U.N. is our recourse!
We can not act on our own!

Ummm ok, this is why folks on the far left can never be voted into office!!

They trust the UN, and dont see any issue with a rogue nation having nukes.

Please tell me this was a sarcastic post?? I mean you can't be serious?

riverrat55 · 10-09-2006, 08:32 PM

Why do you presume that I am a member of the
far left as you call it?
I am a middle of the road American veteran who can not
stand the rhetoric of either the far left or far right!!!
Is it un-american to question what your govt or any govt
is telling you?
If it is then we have lost what we as a country stand for!!!
Freedom!!!

Skip N · 10-09-2006, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by riverrat55

Why do you presume that I am a member of the
far left as you call it?
I am a middle of the road American veteran who can not
stand the rhetoric of either the far left or far right!!!
Is it un-american to question what your govt or any govt
is telling you?
If it is then we have lost what we as a country stand for!!!
Freedom!!!

You can say what you want, all i'm saying is your logic reagrding NK to be able to have nukes is rather odd, and kinda scary!

UserRemoved1 · 10-10-2006, 04:34 AM

Yanno this could all be a real big HOAX

They've got a bunch of scientists that say the signature don't match nuke....It better matches a 500 ton tnt blast...

Wouldn't it be a kicker if the little $!@#$#@! got 500 tons of dynamite together, blew it up, and then said it was nuke....think about it and look at what he's got to gain. I'm waiting to hear they found radiation levels somewhere....

UserRemoved1 · 10-10-2006, 04:37 AM

too funny

UserRemoved1 · 10-10-2006, 04:38 AM

The very first article I read on Drudge today after I posted the above:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/natio...5158-2477r.htm