Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jim in CT  but she was non profit until last year, didn’t charge the schools.  .  that’s when she started charging fees, after she was the first lady of the state. she made 1.4m last year.  not i. 2012, last year. 
 anything else to add?
 | 
	
 . she made 1.4m last year. Do you ever not lie 
Tax records show that since 2012 the nonprofit has generated $1,483,001 in film screening revenue,  that’s in the Fox article 
So you think non profits  mean no profits?   like I said you are moron 
non-profit organization is a group organized for purposes other than generating profit and in which no part of the organization's income is distributed to its members, directors, or officers.  Can you show she cashed in ?   Of course the answer is no.
And of course Fox News Digital recently reported that the films contain sexually explicit imagery and push students to feel "shame and sorrow"  typical morality police nonsense  
FYI You go to a no profit it’s called a church 
Jim do yourself a favor and actually read the story 
