Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Main Forum » StriperTalk!

StriperTalk! All things Striper

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-29-2014, 07:13 PM   #1
Nebe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Nebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
1 @ 28" has been passed.

I'm ok with this. I'd prefer one at 36 but this is better than nothing. Also it will be easier for enforcement as most everyone knows 28" is the magic number. Change it to 36" and in sure a lot if 28" fish would be taken by accident.

Well that's my ten cents.
Nebe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:18 PM   #2
iamskippy
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
iamskippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: A village some where
Posts: 3,436
Wait so you are saying is that in what state we can only keep 1 fish that messures exactly 28"?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
iamskippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:21 PM   #3
PRBuzz
BuzzLuck
iTrader: (0)
 
PRBuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brockton
Posts: 6,414
Send a message via Skype™ to PRBuzz
Yup Skip no 28 1/8" fish!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
PRBuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:24 PM   #4
iamskippy
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
iamskippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: A village some where
Posts: 3,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRBuzz View Post
Yup Skip no 28 1/8" fish!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
What state? And thats bull#^&#^&#^&#^& bunch of cry babies
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
iamskippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:26 PM   #5
Nebe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Nebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamskippy View Post
Wait so you are saying is that in what state we can only keep 1 fish that messures exactly 28"?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Well .. An altered state if you like
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Nebe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:28 PM   #6
tysdad115
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
tysdad115's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pembroke
Posts: 3,343
1@28 (or greater). Including rec and party boats. Individual states could vote for something like 1@32, but conservational equivalent to a 25% in harvest. Is that correct?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
tysdad115 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:29 PM   #7
tysdad115
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
tysdad115's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pembroke
Posts: 3,343
Coast wide Skip.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
tysdad115 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:29 PM   #8
Raven
........
iTrader: (0)
 
Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
Blog Entries: 1
27 and 7/8's must be released .... makes sense
Raven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:30 PM   #9
Nebe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Nebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
"conservation equivalency"
That could be the stickler as it enables things to be tweaked by each state I think.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Nebe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:32 PM   #10
tysdad115
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
tysdad115's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pembroke
Posts: 3,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe View Post
"conservation equivalency"
That could be the stickler as it enables things to be tweaked by each state I think.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
But limited to 1@?, as a minimum? If a state chooses to be more conservative they can vote the 1@32 or something, but 1 fish per day. This is excellent.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Does your incessant whining make you feel better? How about you just shut the hell up and suck it up? It's a fishing forum , so please just stop.
tysdad115 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:43 PM   #11
thefishingfreak
"Fishbucket"
iTrader: (1)
 
thefishingfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bahston Hahbah
Posts: 6,588
Works for me
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
thefishingfreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:44 PM   #12
iamskippy
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
iamskippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: A village some where
Posts: 3,436
Maybe i am miss understanding the original post......

Is its 28" or greater or 28" only.

I have no problem with 1 per day as long as it is a slot or a greater than.

We all know i only catch shorts anyways.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
iamskippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:52 PM   #13
tysdad115
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
tysdad115's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pembroke
Posts: 3,343
One per day at 28 or bigger! Knucklehead.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
tysdad115 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:55 PM   #14
tysdad115
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
tysdad115's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pembroke
Posts: 3,343
About damn time the recs took the hit too.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
tysdad115 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 07:56 PM   #15
iamskippy
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
iamskippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: A village some where
Posts: 3,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by tysdad115 View Post
One per day at 28 or bigger! Knucklehead.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Well thats diff and it wasnt said, my luck i would be the only cracker to get arrested for a 28 1/8" fish as my PB
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
iamskippy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 08:06 PM   #16
Ian
Idiot
iTrader: (0)
 
Ian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Glastonbury, CT
Posts: 2,287
Conservational equivalency just means that whatever measure States introduce have to have technical committee sign-off that their alternative to 1@28 produces the same 25% reduction in harvest totals that the 1@28 overarching motion was introduced to create.

Hence the gray area it introduces
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Ian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 08:10 PM   #17
Piscator
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Piscator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marshfield, Ma
Posts: 2,150
This is good...to clarify, this is a 1 year rule or is it 3 years or indefinitely? I had to get off the call before the vote.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Piscator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 08:12 PM   #18
Nebe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Nebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
I'm curious if there was any reduction in commercial Harvest limits.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Nebe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 08:23 PM   #19
niko
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
niko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: marshfield
Posts: 3,620
I believe it was 25% for the comms as well eben, and the book went out yesterday

my 1st wife didn't like me fishing so much
niko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 08:27 PM   #20
Piscator
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Piscator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marshfield, Ma
Posts: 2,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by niko View Post
I believe it was 25% for the comms as well eben, and the book went out yesterday
I think you right Paul, 25% total harvest including comm.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"I know a taxidermy man back home. He gonna have a heart attack when he see what I brung him!"
Piscator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 08:27 PM   #21
Clammer
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Clammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Warwick RI,02889
Posts: 11,786
PERSONALLY i LIKE 1 @ 28 .IT GIVES THE GUY THAT BUYS FROZEN POGIES @ THE BAITSHOP & FISHES FROM SHORE A FAIR CHANCE OF CATCHING SUPPER . @ 36" THE AVERAGE SHORE FISHERMAN WOULD HAVE A 90% ON NOT GETTING A LEGAL FISH .DISREGUARD THE PLUGGERS /MEAT FISHERMAN , ETC

ENJOY WHAT YOU HAVE !!!

MIKE
Clammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 08:33 PM   #22
big jay
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
big jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 14000 / 44031.5
Posts: 932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe View Post
"conservation equivalency"
That could be the stickler as it enables things to be tweaked by each state I think.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
I'm concerned about this as well.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
big jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 08:42 PM   #23
zimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethany CT
Posts: 2,883
step in the right direction. 1@ exactly 28" would a been a better choice though

No, no, no. we’re 30… 30, three zero.
zimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 08:44 PM   #24
Nebe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Nebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,692
Micro slot
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Nebe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 09:28 PM   #25
BatesBCheatin
Albie Addicted
iTrader: (0)
 
BatesBCheatin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Not the 7 mile slum
Posts: 285
Thumbs up Hoping for 32", but...

Like $3.00 a gallon gasoline it could always be better, but you won't hear me bitching about it.

"Don't kill them for ego, don't kill them because they're legal, and don't kill them for someone else." - Doc Muller
BatesBCheatin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 09:30 PM   #26
ivanputski
Pete K.
iTrader: (0)
 
ivanputski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,953
Great news. Its more than i thought they would do honestly. I listened online for a many hours today... It could have gone either way.
Definitely a great step towards preserving bass
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
ivanputski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 10:23 PM   #27
Rob Rockcrawler
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Rob Rockcrawler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sturbridge MA
Posts: 3,127
I am happy with it. I would have preferred 32 or 36 but this is a big step in the right direction. When does this become effective, Jan 1 2015?

Everything is better on the rocks.
Rob Rockcrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 10:43 PM   #28
FishermanTim
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
FishermanTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hyde Park, MA
Posts: 4,152
Definitely a good step in the right direction.

Now if there was only stricter punishments for poachers.
Somehow the existing fines and penalties just don't seem to do the trick.

I am a legend in my own mind!
FishermanTim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 11:07 PM   #29
Rob Rockcrawler
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Rob Rockcrawler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sturbridge MA
Posts: 3,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by FishermanTim View Post
Definitely a good step in the right direction.

Now if there was only stricter punishments for poachers.
Somehow the existing fines and penalties just don't seem to do the trick.
Agreed, until the fines make it not worth getting caught people will continue to do it. Loss of gear, boats, vehicles, fines that hurt and jail time may do the trick.

Everything is better on the rocks.
Rob Rockcrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2014, 11:51 PM   #30
BasicPatrick
M.S.B.A.
iTrader: (0)
 
BasicPatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: I live in the Villiage of Hyannis in the Town of Barnstable in the Commonwealth of MA
Posts: 2,795
Send a message via AIM to BasicPatrick Send a message via Yahoo to BasicPatrick
A lot of motions were passed today...In my opinion the most important two were...

1) They passed a motion cutting Amendment 6 coastwise commercial quotas by 25%

2) They passed the motion for coastwise recreational catch selecting Option B1 (1@ 28") and setting the conservation equivalency at 25%

Yes, just as is currently allowed, states can submit an alternative measure that meets Technical Committee approval based on a minimum 25% reduction in landings. I am already hearing that RI will consider a conservation equivalency for the for hire fleet...based purely on what I see in the existing analysis Instead of 1 @ 28" (the document credits this as a 31% reduction) A state could choose 2 fish over 33" (the document credits this a 29% reduction).

Bottom line is we will all have to be vigilant in our individual states and participate when local measures are developed

Bottom line is we WON the 1 year reduction, we won a reduction of at least 25% across the board. THIS WAS ALARGE WIN

BIG KUDOS to all that shoed up today including: Craig from Van Stall, Toby from The Fisherman, Jimmy Fee from On The Water, Willy Young and crew from the NY Alliance, Steve Medeiros & crew from RISAA, the guys from MD, the crew from ME that brought and distributed the Save Our Stripers hats, the guy from the 1@ 32 FB page who brought the signs and the crew from MSBA...TOGETHER WE DID IT

They Listened...Yes They DID

"It is impossible to complain and to achieve at the same time"--Basic Patrick (on a good day)

BasicPatrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com