Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » Political Threads

Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-15-2008, 03:35 PM   #1
RIJIMMY
sick of bluefish
iTrader: (1)
 
RIJIMMY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 8,672
Spence - my Iraq post

remember my post on - Iraq? last week? pretty interesting write up, seems I wasnt a nut , the war has been absent from the media and the election. I agree 100% with this article

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Whatever happened to the war?


CNN's Tom Foreman reports from the Iowa caucuses earlier this month.

For months, it was all the rage on the campaign trail. Democratic contenders never missed a chance to pound on the Bush administration, rip the Republicans and remind voters over and over how badly things were going in Iraq.

Republicans, as often as not, staunchly insisted that distant battles and homeland security went hand-in-hand. Day after day, stop after stop, the war was the focus of all things presidential.

Now, the war is little more than a distant echo in most stump speeches. The Democrats are generally saying little more than "We should get out as soon as we can." The Republicans are hardly mentioning it.

Why?

Here's a theory: Republicans know that a defining characteristic of the electorate now is widespread distaste for the war that Bush launched and has continued with the help of the Republican Party. Watch why candidates are keeping quiet on the war »

They know that voters want out, and so most of the GOP campaigners are like kids who got bad grades in school last week: Although they need to address the issue, for the moment they'd rather not mention it, for fear of further punishment.


The biggest exception of course, is Arizona Sen. John McCain. He is still talking about the war extensively and still trying to make the case for a continued U.S. presence in Iraq for years to come.

But why aren't the Democrats talking it up so much anymore?

Simple: The war is going much, much better than it was a year ago -- even a few months ago. You might even say we are winning. I fully accept that anytime our young people are dying and civilians are being killed in the midst of combat, it is difficult to even talk about winning or losing. But fatalities for troops and civilians alike are way down.

The Iraqis, no matter how much they have stumbled and failed in the political process, are finally reopening their shops, their schools, and their neighborhoods. They are taking more control of their own country, and long-awaited reconciliation between warring factions is slowly, haltingly getting under way.

Iraq is certainly not at peace, but it is undeniably much more peaceful than it was.


The only top-tier Democratic candidate still talking extensively and insistently about the need to get out of Iraq quickly is former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards.

Much can still go wrong in Iraq: civil war, a resurgent insurgency, interlopers from Iran, Syria, al Qaeda. The truth is that neither party knows what is going to happen there.

It's easy, however, to see what is happening here.

On the whole, both parties are shelving the issue because it contains too many uncertainties that could upset their plans for political power.

Most Americans -- and all the politicians -- have insisted that no matter how we feel about the war, we should support our troops while they are there.


It is hard to imagine how ignoring something for political expedience translates into support.

Here's an inconvenient truth: Our fellow citizens are risking their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan to carry out a difficult scheme, which was approved by both Republicans and Democrats; yet our political leaders will not even risk even their careers to talk about it now.

making s-b.com a kinder, gentler place for all
RIJIMMY is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 04:18 PM   #2
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
Isn't an article discussing a lack of Iraq war coverage by its very nature in fact covering the Iraq war?

-spence
spence is offline  
Old 01-18-2008, 06:50 PM   #3
Joe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 3,650
The article is about the canidates avoiding the Iraq issue. Which they should, if they want to win the election. The candidates know the public wants to hear, "bring the troops home now," and they all know it's impossible. If they go in front of the cameras and say "it's going to be ten more years, here's my plan," it's political suicide.

The candidates are focused on this vague notion of "change" with few specifics attached. With respect to Iraq - I think it's accurate to say that the public is associating "change" with an implied, but yet-to-be-articulated exit strategy - which of course it is not.

Joe is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 11:43 AM   #4
Skitterpop
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Skitterpop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 3,781
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe View Post
The article is about the canidates avoiding the Iraq issue. Which they should, if they want to win the election. The candidates know the public wants to hear, "bring the troops home now," and they all know it's impossible. If they go in front of the cameras and say "it's going to be ten more years, here's my plan," it's political suicide.

The candidates are focused on this vague notion of "change" with few specifics attached. With respect to Iraq - I think it's accurate to say that the public is associating "change" with an implied, but yet-to-be-articulated exit strategy - which of course it is not.

Once again a voice of reason .

Good health and family
Skitterpop is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:27 PM   #5
justplugit
Registered Grandpa
iTrader: (0)
 
justplugit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe View Post

The candidates are focused on this vague notion of "change" with few specifics attached. With respect to Iraq - I think it's accurate to say that the public is associating "change" with an implied, but yet-to-be-articulated exit strategy - which of course it is not.
Yup, and so far, including tonight's debates, Hillary says she will start to bring them home within 60 days of her election and have them all out within one year. Edwards says all troops home within one year.

Lights years from a yet-to-be articulated exit strategy.

" Choose Life "
justplugit is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 08:45 AM   #6
Raven
........
iTrader: (0)
 
Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
Blog Entries: 1
which means

Quote:
Originally Posted by justplugit View Post
Yup, and so far, including tonight's debates, Hillary says she will start to bring them home within 60 days of her election and have them all out within one year. Edwards says all troops home within one year.

Lights years from a yet-to-be articulated exit strategy.



that they are both clueless....
Raven is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 08:48 AM   #7
Joe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 3,650
Yes, I agree. Saying you'll be out in a year is light years away from an exit strategy.

Joe is offline  
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com