Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Main Forum » StriperTalk!

StriperTalk! All things Striper

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-28-2005, 02:17 PM   #1
DZ
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
DZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
Whatever happened to “Catch and Release”?

Whatever happened to “Catch and Release”?

Here is a question I’ve been pondering for the past few years. I’d be interested in hearing any thoughts on the topic.

For the past 10 years or so I’ve seen many sharpies, high hooks, etc, keep/kill large bass even though they have taken plenty as large or larger in the past. This past season I saw quite a few instances of it, the most recent incident happened in November when at least two 50s and a few 40s were killed by a few charter captains (with no paying customers aboard at the time.) These two guys have taken multiple 50s in the past. But this question is not just about them, its about everyone. Some of the guys I fish with on occasion also keep large fish that are not their “personal bests”. I am in no way denigrating anyone – I just want to know your opinions/reasoning.

I also have many cohorts in the surf who will not keep a fish over 30 pounds – to us fish this large are too valuable a resource to kill, the only exception we would make to our rule is a personal best – a fish for the wall - which I can understand.
If we want a bass for the table a 12-20 pound fish is more than enough.
Our fishing club contest also makes it easier by allowing entered bass to be weighed on a hand scale, witnessed by another angler, then released alive We instituted this club rule in the 1980s and have used it ever since. Some may scoff that this rule is rife for abuse but we’ve never had anyone cheat for a measly trophy or $30 cash prize.

While reading “Striper Wars” by #^&#^&#^&#^& Russell I was reminded of how and why the “Catch and release” craze began in the striped bass fishery during the 1980s. This concept really caught on and helped revive a fishery that was in peril. But even back then when there were very few bass to be had, there were fishermen who would kill every legal bass they could. The reason: commercial sale – which was/is a very valid reason (though maybe not very ethical at that time.)

Nowadays there is still commercial sale of striped bass and it remains a valid/legal reason to kill large bass, a policy that I don’t necessarily agree with but do understand.

So here are the questions: please keep your response civil.

Are anglers who keep big bass (and not sell them) even though they've taken many that are even larger, doing it just for a “Photo Op” or notoriety?

Are anglers just killing bass for entry into their fishing club contests?

Can we rationalize keeping large cows when we can just as well keep a smaller specimen?

Thanks for your response.

DZ

DZ
Recreational Surfcaster
"Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your Limit"

Bi + Ne = SB 2

If you haven't heard of the Snowstorm Blitz of 1987 - you someday will.
DZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 02:37 PM   #2
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,270
Blog Entries: 1
I don't keep many bass at all - a few for the table and I would prefer those under 15-20 pounds max. Would I keep a yearly best? Perhaps. Would I keep a lifetime best? Perhaps

Sure it is legal to be able to keep your two per day but is it really necessary??

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 02:49 PM   #3
MakoMike
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
MakoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
DZ,

Re:"Our fishing club contest also makes it easier by allowing entered bass to be weighed on a hand scale, witnessed by another angler, then released alive We instituted this club rule in the 1980s and have used it ever since"

What if I told you that weighing the fish on a hand scale before releasing it increases post release mortality by well over 100%? I don't want to go into all the details but you will find tham in an article I'm working for On The water, what will appear in a couple of months.

****MakoMike****

Http://www.Makomania.net

Official S-B Sponsor
MakoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 03:01 PM   #4
Krispy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,990
Seriously tho, is mortality still estimated at 8%? So 16% +- for fish put on a scale. Do those mortality numbers change for weighing larger 25lb + size fish? I assume a higher rate, since most arent weighing much smaller than that

Last edited by Krispy; 12-28-2005 at 03:09 PM..

Sooner or later you're going to realize just as I did that there's a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. - Morpheus
Krispy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 03:11 PM   #5
DZ
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
DZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
Interesting Mike - I've heard that before. Would be a very interesting article - I'm sure it would apply to bass being held out of the water by any means (lip gaffed, held by gill cover, etc). That said I like their chances of survival being weighed and released than being thrown in the cooler.

DZ

DZ
Recreational Surfcaster
"Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your Limit"

Bi + Ne = SB 2

If you haven't heard of the Snowstorm Blitz of 1987 - you someday will.
DZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 03:17 PM   #6
Nebe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Nebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,690
i agree with backbeach. i released a fish in the 30's this fall and was treated with doubt from a few guys. I just feel good knowing that that fish is still alive. I will only kill a large bass if i feel its a gone-er. The last big one i kept was 37 lbs and i still feel bad that i killed it. I fed alot of people with it, but personally i would rather eat a 28.1 inch bass anydayof the week.. less toxins.

let the breeders go.
Nebe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 04:20 PM   #7
MakoMike
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
MakoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by DZ
Interesting Mike - I've heard that before. Would be a very interesting article - I'm sure it would apply to bass being held out of the water by any means (lip gaffed, held by gill cover, etc). That said I like their chances of survival being weighed and released than being thrown in the cooler.

DZ
DZ,
You have that right, the bigger the fish the less it's chance for survival after being weighted.

****MakoMike****

Http://www.Makomania.net

Official S-B Sponsor
MakoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 03:05 PM   #8
Back Beach
Respect your elvers
iTrader: (0)
 
Back Beach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: franklin ma
Posts: 3,368
If I want a fish for the table, I will usually take the first decent size keeper I catch whether it is 30 inches or 30 pounds and release the rest. As for taking the real big ones, I like to document and authenticate a real large fish on an official scale, thus to me, the fish must be kept and witnessed IMO. One thing that has always been ingrained in me by one of my mentors is that if you want to brag or boast about a large fish, all the power to you, but make sure it is official and "show me the slip". When I hear stories about the guys who "released 50's", I think great, but how did you get an "official" weight with a hand scale or other device while out in the elements? To some, authenticating the fish is unimportant, but for me, that would be the reason I would keep one.
Back Beach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 03:34 PM   #9
SandyPtMayor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 24
i bring a camera with me on my kayak and snap pictures of the stripers i catch...i kept two this year and one was given to a family of four to enjoy....
SandyPtMayor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 03:37 PM   #10
BigFish
BigFish Bait Co.
iTrader: (1)
 
BigFish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hanover
Posts: 23,392
Send a message via AIM to BigFish
I keep maybe 2 stripers a year....the first decent keeper.....30 inches....for the table/freezer and I might keep my largest of the season.....that might only be in the 25-30 pound range. If I catch a personal best....it depends on the size I guess.....I might just get a few snap shots and let it go on its merry way....I won't mount a fish....it depends on the certain situation I guess.

Almost time to get our fish on!!!
BigFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 04:15 PM   #11
Joe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 3,650
They're probably keeping it so they will have a better chance of being believed. Its gotten pretty common within the fishing community for rumors to circulate that somebody's trophy catch was either a figment of their imagination or a commercial by-catch passed off as a rod and reel catch.

It's more complicated than just; catch-and-release is good, keeping fish is bad.

What do I think? My opinion is that long as a person is within the law, what they do with their catch is their own business. More effort should be made toward catching the poachers - a lot more fish are falling to them - they're not smiling for the camera.

Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 03:46 PM   #12
choggieman
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
choggieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 313
I personally beleive most big fish are kept for the sole purpose of bragging. They are not good eating, skin mounts are a thing of the past and lotsa people need to prove how big they're johnson is by showing everyone their catch. Let them go, they are too rare a commodity to kill for a picture. But, 28 inch bass some of my marinade.... mm mm good.
choggieman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 04:15 PM   #13
BigFish
BigFish Bait Co.
iTrader: (1)
 
BigFish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hanover
Posts: 23,392
Send a message via AIM to BigFish
Choggieman....you are generalizing by throwing a blanket over everyone that wants to keep a large fish....it is their fish and, within the bounds of the law, they are entitled to it whether you like it or not! Good for you...you let all yours go except the 28 inch yummies....but don't go pouncing on everyone that keeps anything over 32 inches....that is just plain wrong!

PS- I take my pictures and then release.

Almost time to get our fish on!!!
BigFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 04:24 PM   #14
Karl F
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Karl F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
Smile 2 cents

Personally, I keep less than I used to.
My preference is for the smaller fish, flavor, texture, and I hear the less toxin arguement as well. I'm of an age that I can remember when a 16 inch fish used to be a keeper, and I will tell you a fat 16-20 inch fish, is by far the best eating.

I know of one big fish kept by a well known trophy hunter this year, that would have gone back, had it not been hooked so deep, and bleeding profusley, and this was on a plug, so as not to get the bait vs artificial thing going. He has told me he will only keep large, if it looks like a record, from now on, he still keeps the occasianal 28 inch table fish, as do I.

And yes Slip, my personal best went back in this year, hooked thru the lip, easy measure, unhook, no pictures, and farewell.

I'd like to see the law read that a fish that is obviously going to die, under 28, could be kept legally... I see some with gut hooked, bleeding schoolies, going back in.. lot of seal food, that could be somebodys lunch, IMHO.

Anybody keeping fish to feed the family, I'm fine with that, I think we have all been there.
Karl F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 04:28 PM   #15
choggieman
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
choggieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 313
I wasn't trying to stir the pot. Too often someone catches or claims to have caught a fish they are dragging around town showing the world. In my experience the guy that is doing so is doing it for the glory, not for any other reason. I see all too often the instant heros made by a catch. In some cases I am a firm beleiver men have bought fish from draggers or commercial guys just to self promote themselves as heros. I am passionate about striped bass and hate to see a magestic fish killed for the sake of glory. I have more respect for the man that releases that fish than the one who parades it. In this sport credibilty is always in question, but if you have to lie about a fish, you are also self promoting. I have and will kill fish up to 20 lbs for the table, but I promise you will never see me or any of my fishing partners parade around with a big fish killed for the sake of showing off.
choggieman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 04:38 PM   #16
BigFish
BigFish Bait Co.
iTrader: (1)
 
BigFish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hanover
Posts: 23,392
Send a message via AIM to BigFish
I agree with you there Choggieman....I hate waste...especially when people keep 2 fish everytime out...how much fish can you eat?

Almost time to get our fish on!!!
BigFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 04:46 PM   #17
basswipe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
basswipe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: RI
Posts: 5,704
After having just finished "Striper Wars" my appreciation and understanding of what it took to get the bass to where its at today brings me to the conclusion that releasing fish should be the rule rather than the exception.

Will I ever keep another bass for the table?.Absolutely.Just nowhere near as many.
basswipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 05:45 PM   #18
Pete_G
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Pete_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Newport, RI
Posts: 2,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFish
I agree with you there Choggieman....I hate waste...especially when people keep 2 fish everytime out...how much fish can you eat?

I always have the same reaction to some of these photos. A pair of 20's produces some pretty big fillets. Even if you give some away to neighbors on both sides, it's still a lot if you are good at filleting a fish. I just don't get it.

I'm with DZ, all my 30+ went back this year. All but 1 under 30 did too. I'd keep more if I truly felt the fishery was healthy.

Our charter captains guided clients to way more then a few 40+ # bass on plugs from the whitewater this year, I'm proud to say we don't kill 'em all just to get a pic. Besides, it's not that hard to take a quick pic and slide them back into the sea. Every single fish was released and we can still barely keep up with the demand for charters. I find it tough to respect captains who kill a large number of fish just for bragging rights. If you're good word will spread with or without photographs of dead fish.
Pete_G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 04:57 PM   #19
Roger
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Roger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lincoln, RI
Posts: 621
In order to help preserve the resource I have taken it upon myself over the last few years to not catch anything much over 30# , no matter how much I try.

That's my story and I'm stickin' with it.

Best regards,
Roger
Roger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 05:15 PM   #20
Offshore
Bay & Beach Inspector
iTrader: (0)
 
Offshore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mid-Cape
Posts: 155
I killed four stripers this year - all for the table. I released somewhere near 5-600. I fish 3-4 days per week from April to November on Cape Cod and often go south when the fish leave here, so I fish a lot.

As for your questions:

1. I have no way of knowing why another angler keeps a fish. So long as it is taken legally and disposed of legally, I don't think its' any of my business

2. I suppose some do but, as long as they take and dispose of them legally, I don't think it's any of my business.

3. I suppose some folks can but I don't. I'd rather keep a small fish but, sometimes have to keep a large one if it's injured.
Offshore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 05:15 PM   #21
Backbeach Jake
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Backbeach Jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Here and There Seasonally
Posts: 5,985
When I started fishing, it was to fill the freezer. We'd codfish in March and April from shore. Do stripers when they came. And the annual Quincy Bay trip finished it off. Today I still enjoy the security of having a few fillets in the freezer, but it's not like it was; PACKED! I keep the smallish keepers and send the cows home. I owe them that. And they are the future of the fishery. Keeping the legal limit of keepers is ok, but I have this debt to the species. They got me through, and I'll see them through. Good thread, this one...

He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.
Thomas Paine
Backbeach Jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 05:11 PM   #22
Goose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by DZ
Whatever happened to “Catch and Release”?



Nowadays there is still commercial sale of striped bass and it remains a valid/legal reason to kill large bass, a policy that I don’t necessarily agree with but do understand.



DZ
I don't like the fact that so many guys take two every time, never mind it being #30 or #40, surf or boat, it doesn't matter. Some want to impress others and feed others.... they take it for granted, I've been guilty of that. But theres a fine line there. I think most surf guys don't realize how many 1000's and 1000's of pounds are taken commerialy every season. So why should I release so that some commerial guy can pay for his obsession?? F that!! I take what I want when I want and feel no guilt about it. As long as I'm not abuseing.
Goose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 05:13 PM   #23
BigFish
BigFish Bait Co.
iTrader: (1)
 
BigFish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hanover
Posts: 23,392
Send a message via AIM to BigFish
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day....teach a man to fish and he becomes a chest pounding sharpie wanna be!

Almost time to get our fish on!!!
BigFish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 05:25 PM   #24
piemma
Very Grumpy bay man
iTrader: (0)
 
piemma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 10,824
Blog Entries: 2
I saw a guy absolutely mutilate a 20 inch bass this Fall. Eye ripped out, bleeding profusely. I told him to keep it. He said "but it's not legal!" He threw it back and it wash up dead a few minutes later. Do you guys think he did the right thing? I don't. I think he was better off eating the fish than leaving it for the crabs and gulls.
Personally, I release a lot of my fish. I also catch a lot of fish because I put a lot of time in. I also keep some fish for the table. That's one of the reasons I fish. I like eating bass. If that's unsportsman like then, so be it. Just a point of fact. I never keep a fish under 34" and I think that the 2 fish 28" law is stupid.

1) There is no reason to keep 2 fish a day....ever

2) I don't think we should be killing 28 inch fish.

3) I liked it back in the early 90's when the law was one 34".

No boat, back in the suds.
piemma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 05:26 PM   #25
MakoMike
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
MakoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goose
theres a fine line there. I think most surf guys don't realize how many 1000's and 1000's of pounds are taken commerialy every season. So why should I release so that some commerial guy can pay for his obsession?? F that!! I take what I want when I want and feel no guilt about it. As long as I'm not abuseing.
FYI almost 80% of the striper catch is by recreational fishermen. So if you want to know who's catching the lions share of the fish, just look in the mirror.

****MakoMike****

Http://www.Makomania.net

Official S-B Sponsor
MakoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 05:37 PM   #26
Backbeach Jake
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Backbeach Jake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Here and There Seasonally
Posts: 5,985
I once asked an Enviro Cop about keeping a dying striper. He said "Don't get caught, it'll get you fined. You can't eat it, but something will." As much as we hate that feeling of waste, I guess it's part of the price of the ticket.

He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.
Thomas Paine
Backbeach Jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 05:46 PM   #27
Slipknot
Super Moderator
iTrader: (0)
 
Slipknot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middleboro MA
Posts: 17,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakoMike
FYI almost 80% of the striper catch is by recreational fishermen. So if you want to know who's catching the lions share of the fish, just look in the mirror.

I for one would love to know where that figure is arrived from. And also if it includes all the bycatch dead stripers in that total. I am not that surprised by it since there are thousands more times recreational fishermen than commercial fishermen fishing for bass, so why not say that recs kill 5 times as many? What difference does it make which group catches the lions' share?

The United States Constitution does not exist to grant you rights; those rights are inherent within you. Rather it exists to frame a limited government so that those natural rights can be exercised freely.

1984 was a warning, not a guidebook!

It's time more people spoke up with the truth. Every time we let a leftist lie go uncorrected, the commies get stronger.
Slipknot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 07:01 PM   #28
MotoXcowboy
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
MotoXcowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,008
I fished alot this summer/fall (missed the spring run b/c i couldnt walk, (crashed the bike...). Anyways, out of the 300 or so stripers I caught, only a half dozen were keepers. 3 went home with me. All 34" or under.. Out of those three I got a bunch of meals, the 34 yeilded 7 small meals! A few fillets were even given to friends and family, and I still had a ton of fish in the freezer most of the season...infact i still have a big hunk in the freezer from Novembers catch.

I too wonder how guys killing 2 a night have the room in their bellies or freezers to keep all that meat..

I like to eat stripers but not every night!!
eh jus my 2cents..

The bloos on the other hand...they usually injure themselves during the battle so I take the dying ones home for my friend to smoke or I mix up a little bloopo for my dog cowboy...

Last edited by MotoXcowboy; 12-28-2005 at 07:08 PM..
MotoXcowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2005, 10:04 PM   #29
Swimmer
Retired Surfer
iTrader: (0)
 
Swimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sunset Grill
Posts: 9,511
Important opinons

People who write and research the sport of fishing should be paying close attention to this board and the opinons and ideas of its members. Its the answers and opinons you all gave here that will keep the bass around.

Not to create a flame where thier isn't any, but there are boat captains that keep and sell anything and everything they get thier hands on when no one is looking. They preach one thing out of one side of thier mouth all the while hypocrasy rears its ugly head out of the other side of the mouth. And ther is no one around to watch them. Rec guys might take 80 % of the bass like MakoMike says, but that can't compete against rogue charter captains that know where the fish are on a day to day basis and hunt them down with or without clients on board. Someone is always around to watch the rec guy, but no one is ever there to watch the boat captain who has a propensity toward whatever........

When we have guys here like PETE G who rolls every bass back into the surf thats something to be proud of and looked up too. I congratulate saltwatersedge and thier clients for doing that. On the flip side thier is nothing unlawful about taking your two fish. Many people here have taken the stand since I have been on this site, since 2000, that C & R is the way to go to preserve our future. It used to be the other way around.

Swimmer a.k.a. YO YO MA
Serial Mailbox Killer/Seal Fisherman
Swimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2005, 10:07 AM   #30
DZ
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
DZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
Thanks for all the replys - some real good opinions that were well thought out. I respect them all. They have really helped me understand the "mind set" of those of us who chase bass.

Appreciate all your input.

DZ

DZ
Recreational Surfcaster
"Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your Limit"

Bi + Ne = SB 2

If you haven't heard of the Snowstorm Blitz of 1987 - you someday will.
DZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com