Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Main Forum » StriperTalk!

StriperTalk! All things Striper

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-18-2006, 03:47 PM   #1
eelman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,036
eel meeting?

What time is the %$%$%$%$in eel meeting tonight?

I am going................
eelman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 03:51 PM   #2
DZ
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
DZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
6pm at Corliss Auditorium. I'll be there.

DZ

DZ
Recreational Surfcaster
"Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your Limit"

Bi + Ne = SB 2

If you haven't heard of the Snowstorm Blitz of 1987 - you someday will.
DZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 03:53 PM   #3
RIROCKHOUND
Also known as OAK
iTrader: (0)
 
RIROCKHOUND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
Same;
Should be there

Bryan

Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
RIROCKHOUND is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 04:20 PM   #4
Canalman
Calling Jon The Fisherman
iTrader: (0)
 
Canalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Sack Of Mass
Posts: 2,357
Are you guys fighting for conservation or for the right to continue using them as bait? Be careful what you wish for.....

Surf Asylum Lures, Custom Lures for the "Committed"
Official S-B Sponsor
Canalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 04:34 PM   #5
RIROCKHOUND
Also known as OAK
iTrader: (0)
 
RIROCKHOUND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
I'll be there as a concerned fisherman, who wants to see the eel population healthy, but also wants to make sure that we dont lose a prime bait w/o due cause

Bryan

Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
RIROCKHOUND is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 05:35 PM   #6
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,464
I think Bryan is really concerned that if there are no more eels, more attention will be brought upon his plugs

Will we have to start calling #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^& "stick-bait"?

Sorry, I really have nothing of value to add

-spence
spence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 05:54 PM   #7
Canalman
Calling Jon The Fisherman
iTrader: (0)
 
Canalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Sack Of Mass
Posts: 2,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Sorry, I really have nothing of value to add

-spence
There's a surprise

Surf Asylum Lures, Custom Lures for the "Committed"
Official S-B Sponsor
Canalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 05:56 PM   #8
Canalman
Calling Jon The Fisherman
iTrader: (0)
 
Canalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Sack Of Mass
Posts: 2,357
Bryan,

I do agree... hell I ONLY fish eels... but, what needs to be done needs to be done. I just ask because we don't need people with the wrong attitude in there it will only compound the problem. Be good Bill "Band"

Surf Asylum Lures, Custom Lures for the "Committed"
Official S-B Sponsor
Canalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 08:23 AM   #9
cheferson
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
cheferson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 3,630
SO whats it looking like?
cheferson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 08:42 AM   #10
RIROCKHOUND
Also known as OAK
iTrader: (0)
 
RIROCKHOUND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
My sense (DZ, #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&, Fisheye might have a different opinion) is that nothing will happen THIS season. I think it is clear to ASMFC that the public comments favor a closure/ban on the elver/glass eel fishery, since obviously alot more eels are killed per pound and at a vital life stage.

The way the timelines work, UNLESS they go with a USFW Endangered route or take emergency action, it will be a year before any formal action is taken by ASMFC. I think we have eels for now, BUT if it comes out to ban the glass eel fishery, please support that. Also if it comes up, several people wanted to look at the amounts of eels exported vs kept in the US.
It was also commented that when compared to the glass eel fishery the recreational and bait take may and probably is much smaller

FYI for an idea of what goes on see
http://northeasteelcompany.homestead.com/eelpage.html
Based on their numbers, if they harvesy 500kg of glass eels, then thats approx 2.5 MILLION baby eels.




And Spence: Bite me you overgrown cornhusker ... my plugs catch fish.... as do my eels.. something you witnessed a night in Oct where I think you got the skunk.. hmm

Last edited by RIROCKHOUND; 01-19-2006 at 08:54 AM..

Bryan

Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
RIROCKHOUND is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 09:12 AM   #11
eelman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
My sense (DZ, #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&, Fisheye might have a different opinion) is that nothing will happen THIS season. I think it is clear to ASMFC that the public comments favor a closure/ban on the elver/glass eel fishery, since obviously alot more eels are killed per pound and at a vital life stage.

The way the timelines work, UNLESS they go with a USFW Endangered route or take emergency action, it will be a year before any formal action is taken by ASMFC. I think we have eels for now, BUT if it comes out to ban the glass eel fishery, please support that. Also if it comes up, several people wanted to look at the amounts of eels exported vs kept in the US.
It was also commented that when compared to the glass eel fishery the recreational and bait take may and probably is much smaller

FYI for an idea of what goes on see
http://northeasteelcompany.homestead.com/eelpage.html
Based on their numbers, if they harvesy 500kg of glass eels, then thats approx 2.5 MILLION baby eels.




And Spence: Bite me you overgrown cornhusker ... my plugs catch fish.... as do my eels.. something you witnessed a night in Oct where I think you got the skunk.. hmm
I agree, I left there feeling good. Looks like there may be a ban on the glass eel fishery, tighter regulation as to "reporting catch" which was aimed at the harvesters and vendors themselves. I didnt leave there feeling that they are going onto the endagered species list.

Hanging around and BSing with the guy , his gut feeling was no endagered species,He mentioned to me that they never did that with Sturgeon and that fish was in much worse shape than the american eel !

I also want to see whats right but, it seems to me and it was pointed out last night numerous times, That the export of eels for food is about 95% versus the bait sector which only accounts for 3 to 5 % of the total numbers.

Bottom line? I see no loss of eels this year and tighter restrictions on them in the future but, my gut tells me eel fisherman will be bangin bass for the foreseeable future.........

He also pointed out that this would not affect "farm raised eels". I think those that are panicking can relax some. They still need to collect tons of data and thats going to take time.
eelman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 09:47 AM   #12
MoroneSaxatilis
googan
iTrader: (0)
 
MoroneSaxatilis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Googanville
Posts: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
He also pointed out that this would not affect "farm raised eels".
I'm confused. Since we know that fish farmers have as yet been unable to get the American eel to reproduce in captivity, where will eels farms get thier stock for raising?

Last edited by MoroneSaxatilis; 01-19-2006 at 09:52 AM..

MoroneSaxatilis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 09:49 AM   #13
Krispy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,990
Yes, eel farms use elvers and raise them

Sooner or later you're going to realize just as I did that there's a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. - Morpheus
Krispy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 10:32 AM   #14
DZ
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
DZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
I agree.

I asked about a timeline and was told that if the petition to place the eel on the endangered species list succeeds: 4-6 months. There will be another US F&W meeting on that petition early this year.

Any new addendum to the Federal Management Plan will take 12-18 months UNLESS there is an Emergency Action to the plan which would have an almost immediate effect.

Also found out that an alternative eel bait market will be available this season: lamprey







Almost forgot:
One good thing for those who showed up at this hearing is that ASMFC keeps a list of who attends – when you sign the attendance sheet you’re eligible for a special permit which will allow you to use eels as bait even if they become endangered. That means that #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&, Rockhound, and I along with a few others are safe. I'm glad I attended. You guys should have come to this meeting.

DZ
Attached Images
File Type: jpg SILVERLAMPREY2.jpg (20.8 KB, 24 views)

DZ
Recreational Surfcaster
"Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your Limit"

Bi + Ne = SB 2

If you haven't heard of the Snowstorm Blitz of 1987 - you someday will.
DZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 12:35 PM   #15
RIROCKHOUND
Also known as OAK
iTrader: (0)
 
RIROCKHOUND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
Mike; didnt know that was you...
Should've said hello.
I was sitting behind Dave Prebble and next to DZ

Bryan

Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
RIROCKHOUND is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 04:12 PM   #16
MakoMike
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
MakoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Mike; didnt know that was you...
Should've said hello.
I was sitting behind Dave Prebble and next to DZ
I figured there were a couple of guys from this board there, but since I only know the Hooters crew by sight, I couldn't identify anyone. I was sitting right accross the aisle fom Dave. After the meeting I talked to Dave for a couple of minutes and then Zach Harvey and then I chatted with Mike Laptew for a while until everybody left.

****MakoMike****

Http://www.Makomania.net

Official S-B Sponsor
MakoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 06:05 PM   #17
timw
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 12
DZ, My brother and I had both been involved with diadromous fishery and river restoration for quite a while before we filed the ESA eel petition. A few years back he began finding adult eels chopped up below hydro dams in Maine, we were both aware of the elver boom in the 90’s, and the problems the elvers had getting upstream past dams. The more research we did on the eel, the more convinced we were there were serious problems that were not being addressed.

In part, what spurred our petition was ASMFC decision to request an ESA review of the eel. Given the sometimes indecisive nature of the ASMFC, this indicated to us there was a serious problem with eel stocks. A problem that ASMFC felt was beyond their ability to control, or to figure out. It was also clear that the individual states did not have the resources or willingness to deal with the problem.

At the time we filed the petition we did not know whether or not the Federal Services would do the ESA status review requested by ASMFC. As it turned out the Services decided to do a stock status review around the same time we filed the petition, but the Services review would not be done under the ESA. We felt it was important to have the review done under ESA, because its requirements are very specific and must be followed by action if it is determined that the species is endangered or threatened. Otherwise they could have found that the eel was endangered or threatened, but there would be no mechanism to force anyone to take action.

#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&, I am not an expert on eels, and don’t pretend to be one. My brother and I are “laymen”; we have hunted, fished and observed all our lives. We are not biologists; we researched and wrote the petition ourselves, on our own time. As for my passion and commitment to eels and the environment, I do the best I can with the time I have.
timw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 07:08 PM   #18
eelman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by timw
DZ, My brother and I had both been involved with diadromous fishery and river restoration for quite a while before we filed the ESA eel petition. A few years back he began finding adult eels chopped up below hydro dams in Maine, we were both aware of the elver boom in the 90’s, and the problems the elvers had getting upstream past dams. The more research we did on the eel, the more convinced we were there were serious problems that were not being addressed.

In part, what spurred our petition was ASMFC decision to request an ESA review of the eel. Given the sometimes indecisive nature of the ASMFC, this indicated to us there was a serious problem with eel stocks. A problem that ASMFC felt was beyond their ability to control, or to figure out. It was also clear that the individual states did not have the resources or willingness to deal with the problem.

At the time we filed the petition we did not know whether or not the Federal Services would do the ESA status review requested by ASMFC. As it turned out the Services decided to do a stock status review around the same time we filed the petition, but the Services review would not be done under the ESA. We felt it was important to have the review done under ESA, because its requirements are very specific and must be followed by action if it is determined that the species is endangered or threatened. Otherwise they could have found that the eel was endangered or threatened, but there would be no mechanism to force anyone to take action.

#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&, I am not an expert on eels, and don’t pretend to be one. My brother and I are “laymen”; we have hunted, fished and observed all our lives. We are not biologists; we researched and wrote the petition ourselves, on our own time. As for my passion and commitment to eels and the environment, I do the best I can with the time I have.
I am glad you explained it ,for that..Thank you! I appreciate you giving us some background as to why..Thanks !
eelman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 07:16 PM   #19
eelman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,036
Now that all this is out there, does anyone have advice on how we can stop the rampant exportation of eels overseas that are used for food...Does thsi no mean contacting senators etc..and get them involved on the WTO level? They stated last night that only 5% is used as bait the remaining 95% is shipped over seas as food fish.
eelman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2006, 11:03 PM   #20
ZuluHotel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wakefield, RI
Posts: 32
Real Change?

Starting to see the logic of the ESA argument--especially after hearing TimW's articulate breakdown. As much as I hate the idea of eels going away as a bait source, I got thinking about the situation on the ride home from the hearing. Any REAL effort to protect eels would have to cross a number of agency boundaries--dealing with hydroelectric licensing, export of glass and food eels, etc. I would have to disagree with a few other posts here. I doubt the stock assessment will paint a very nice picture, and that certainly will have a big impact of USF&W findings, as well as future Commission actions via addenda or amendments. Timeline would likely be 2007 if the USF&W defers to ASMFC, but I suspect the Commission will have to implement something with teeth, likely through possession restriction, in that scenario. Otherwise, I'd expect some major action from USF&W sooner than later.

ASMFC action seems like it will be futile--you're not going to solve stock collapse involving complicated environmental issues by simply banning possession or restricting fishing for eels.

If something is going to be done, I'd just as soon see something that will create REAL change.

Was good to see all in attendance, and I'm sure glad--as Dennis is--that I at least got to pick up my eel-possession exemption permit.

Zach Harvey
ZuluHotel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com