Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Main Forum » StriperTalk!

StriperTalk! All things Striper

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-18-2010, 01:17 PM   #1
MakoMike
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
MakoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
We're screwed on Sea bass!

These are the three proposals for recreation sea bass fishing for 2011:

1) maintain the current minimum fish size and adjust the possession limit and season;
regulations would include a 12.5 inch TL minimum fish size, 2 fish possession limit (-23 fish),
and an open season from June 1 through July 31 and November 1 through December 31;
[0.2622+0.2410-0.0632] = total reduction* = 44.0 percent

2) maintain the current minimum fish size adjust the possession limit and season; regulations
would include a 12.5 inch TL minimum fish size, 5 fish possession limit (-20 fish), and an open
season from July 1 through September 18 and November 1 through December 31;
[0.3864+0.0787-0.304] = total reduction* = 43.5 percent

3) adjust the minimum fish size and possession limit, maintain season; regulations would
include a 13.0 inch TL minimum fish size (+ 0.5 inch TL), 1 fish possession limit (-24 fish), and
an open season from May 22 through October 11 and November 1 through December 31;

****MakoMike****

Http://www.Makomania.net

Official S-B Sponsor
MakoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 01:19 PM   #2
MakoMike
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
MakoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
So the best we can hope for is to be cut from 25 fish per day to 5 fish perday!

****MakoMike****

Http://www.Makomania.net

Official S-B Sponsor
MakoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 01:25 PM   #3
Back Beach
Respect your elvers
iTrader: (0)
 
Back Beach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: franklin ma
Posts: 3,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakoMike View Post
So the best we can hope for is to be cut from 25 fish per day to 5 fish perday!
Is the reduction in quota warranted? Why or why not?

Last edited by Back Beach; 11-18-2010 at 02:02 PM..

It's not the bait
At the end of your line
It's the fishing hole
Where all the fish is blind
Back Beach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 04:25 PM   #4
robc22
zziplex lover
iTrader: (0)
 
robc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: upper cape cod, MA
Posts: 856
your kidding

We get most of our fish in buzzards bay in may.......no season in may!!!!

Lobster Troll #1
robc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 05:33 PM   #5
MakoMike
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
MakoMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Newtown, CT
Posts: 5,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back Beach View Post
Is the reduction in quota warranted? Why or why not?
The current stock assessment has the biomass above the level required for maximum sustainable yield. Close to 150% of the MSY required biomass. Evidently the "scientists" don't believe their own numbers. The commercials are getting hit just as bad, its not a fish grab, unless you consider the NMFS to be grabbing the fish. MA was the only state at 20 fish per day, all the other states were at the permitted 25 fish per day. These are often small fish guys, 25 three pound fish doesn't produce a ton of filets, and who goes fishing for them every day. Yes you MA guys are screwed double, because the big fish are up in Buzzards bay in May.

****MakoMike****

Http://www.Makomania.net

Official S-B Sponsor
MakoMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 05:44 PM   #6
Clammer
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Clammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Warwick RI,02889
Posts: 11,786
Commercially in RI last year was horrible because of the dates they had for commercial season .
even late . commercial was shut all of August /was suppose to open 9/1 ,, 3 days before / they sent out a notice that it wasn,t going to open til 11/1 >3 days after that they extended the rec. ;;

Rumor was [is] that MA. sea bass both rec & commercial in 2010 ,,,,was a slam /blam than you maam season ><><><


as a good friend & a very knowledgeable fisherman has said over & over ........ what ever they purpose or actually put into effect ............just figure that fisherie is in the complete opposite of what they say/do ;

ENJOY WHAT YOU HAVE !!!

MIKE
Clammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 04:30 PM   #7
Rob Rockcrawler
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Rob Rockcrawler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sturbridge MA
Posts: 3,127
Wow, that is a hell of a drop. I dont target them at all but i read the fisherman every week. Seems that regardless of the open season they are biting every where. If the reduction is warranted because of some good scientific evidence im all for. If its just a grab for commercial fisherman than they really need to look more closely at the issue.

Everything is better on the rocks.
Rob Rockcrawler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 04:49 PM   #8
tattoobob
Soggy Bottom Boy
iTrader: (0)
 
tattoobob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Billerica, Ma.
Posts: 7,260
Who needs to keep 25 fish a day? that's 1500 fish per 2 month period per person

Surfcasting Full Throttle

Don't judge me Monkey

Recreational Surfcaster 99.9% C&R
tattoobob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 05:08 PM   #9
niko
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
niko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: marshfield
Posts: 3,620
these fish are very abundant and the stocks are in great shape as far as i can tell. i can catch a limit of them, if i wanted that many, in an hour, or two if it's "slow". this is a rediculous reduction. a 1 fish limit - you've got to be kidding me. i'd be fine with a 10 fish limit

my 1st wife didn't like me fishing so much
niko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 05:08 PM   #10
afterhours
Afterhours Custom Plugs
iTrader: (0)
 
afterhours's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: R.I.
Posts: 8,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by tattoobob View Post
Who needs to keep 25 fish a day? that's 1500 fish per 2 month period per person
what bob said...

www.afterhoursplugs.com

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Afterh...428173?created

Instagram - afterhourscustom

Official S-B.com Sponsor

GAMEFISH NOW

"A GAMEFISH (WHICH STRIPED BASS SHOULD BE) IS TOO VALUABLE TO BE CAUGHT ONLY ONCE"...LEE WULFF
afterhours is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 05:20 PM   #11
MAKAI
Too old to give a....
iTrader: (0)
 
MAKAI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,505
Draconian measures , fish "Science" is far from perfect.

May fortune favor the foolish....
MAKAI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 08:16 PM   #12
robc22
zziplex lover
iTrader: (0)
 
robc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: upper cape cod, MA
Posts: 856
NMFS math

Quote:
Originally Posted by tattoobob View Post
Who needs to keep 25 fish a day? that's 1500 fish per 2 month period per person
What?? you work for nmfs's?......that how they add things up.....lottsa rec. folks sea bass 3 or 4 times a year tops and TRY to fill the freezer, whats wrong with that?......and since sea bass are boat caught fish.....not cheap to run a boat these days.....most guys try to get the most out of the day they run there boat.......again, what's wrong with that?

Lobster Troll #1
robc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 08:41 PM   #13
tattoobob
Soggy Bottom Boy
iTrader: (0)
 
tattoobob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Billerica, Ma.
Posts: 7,260
I don't have a problem with what you state, I'm just saying my example is excessive IMO

Surfcasting Full Throttle

Don't judge me Monkey

Recreational Surfcaster 99.9% C&R
tattoobob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 07:56 AM   #14
afterhours
Afterhours Custom Plugs
iTrader: (0)
 
afterhours's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: R.I.
Posts: 8,642
instead of the usual "let's kill 'em 'till there gone"...i think it's good to be proactive for once. sure wish they'd treat stripers the same way.

www.afterhoursplugs.com

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Afterh...428173?created

Instagram - afterhourscustom

Official S-B.com Sponsor

GAMEFISH NOW

"A GAMEFISH (WHICH STRIPED BASS SHOULD BE) IS TOO VALUABLE TO BE CAUGHT ONLY ONCE"...LEE WULFF
afterhours is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2010, 05:21 PM   #15
surfkaster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 26
the daily possession limited is not 25 fish per day, it is 20...
surfkaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 08:04 AM   #16
InTheHole
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
InTheHole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 540
I agree if there is a problem, adjust the limit, size, season.... but how in the world do you go from 20 fish a day in Mass to the possibility of 1 fish a day over the course of the winter? What is the basis for such a drastic reduction ?

Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day ...
show him where to fish and ... you'll be sorry
InTheHole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 10:14 AM   #17
Fishoholic
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Fishoholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: RI
Posts: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakoMike View Post
These are the three proposals for recreation sea bass fishing for 2011:

1) maintain the current minimum fish size and adjust the possession limit and season;
regulations would include a 12.5 inch TL minimum fish size, 2 fish possession limit (-23 fish),
and an open season from June 1 through July 31 and November 1 through December 31;
[0.2622+0.2410-0.0632] = total reduction* = 44.0 percent

2) maintain the current minimum fish size adjust the possession limit and season; regulations
would include a 12.5 inch TL minimum fish size, 5 fish possession limit (-20 fish), and an open
season from July 1 through September 18 and November 1 through December 31;
[0.3864+0.0787-0.304] = total reduction* = 43.5 percent

3) adjust the minimum fish size and possession limit, maintain season; regulations would
include a 13.0 inch TL minimum fish size (+ 0.5 inch TL), 1 fish possession limit (-24 fish), and
an open season from May 22 through October 11 and November 1 through December 31;
what a crock of %$%$%$%$! Sure wish these guys would pull their heads out of their asses.. maybe actually try fishing for them.. then they will see the true condition of the stocks..
Fishoholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 07:00 PM   #18
missing link
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
missing link's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cranberry Coast Gateway 2 Cape Cod
Posts: 4,143
I'll go for the 5 fish limit for REC ,I don't put fish in the freezer, I catch so many shorts , and I will hold out for a big one and toss a just legal one back,
such a tasty fish the colors of a male with the big hump just a pic of a fish like that makes me happy
LINK ,
Happy Thanksgiving everyone

" Happy as a clam at high tide "
missing link is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2010, 03:07 PM   #19
robc22
zziplex lover
iTrader: (0)
 
robc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: upper cape cod, MA
Posts: 856
Quote:
Originally Posted by missing link View Post
I'll go for the 5 fish limit for REC ,I don't put fish in the freezer, I catch so many shorts , and I will hold out for a big one and toss a just legal one back,
such a tasty fish the colors of a male with the big hump just a pic of a fish like that makes me happy
LINK ,
Happy Thanksgiving everyone
Not enough fish.......it's starting to cost big buck to run the boat for the day.....10 fish minimum........

Lobster Troll #1
robc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-2010, 08:12 PM   #20
JohnnyD
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
JohnnyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 5,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by robc22 View Post
Not enough fish.......it's starting to cost big buck to run the boat for the day.....10 fish minimum........
Right because limits should be based on how much it costs fishermen to go after the species. How about this? If regulators feel that the limits need to be reduced below what's "worth it", they just close the season?

Does anyone have any actual science behind these proposals - good or bad?
JohnnyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2010, 05:08 PM   #21
robc22
zziplex lover
iTrader: (0)
 
robc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: upper cape cod, MA
Posts: 856
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyD View Post
Right because limits should be based on how much it costs fishermen to go after the species. How about this? If regulators feel that the limits need to be reduced below what's "worth it", they just close the season?

Does anyone have any actual science behind these proposals - good or bad?
Ya.....those fishermen and boat owners also happen to be voters,taxpayers and citizens.........so the question I put to you johhny boy is do we manage the fish stocks for the good of the people and the commonwealth or just for the health of the fish stocks unto it's self?

Lobster Troll #1
robc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2010, 10:00 PM   #22
big jay
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
big jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 14000 / 44031.5
Posts: 932
NMFS is now run by the Pew Foundation and they're very simple goal is to stop all fishing.
Get used to it.
big jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 08:02 AM   #23
numbskull
Oblivious // Grunt, Grunt Master
iTrader: (0)
 
numbskull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: over the hill
Posts: 6,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by big jay View Post
NMFS is now run by the Pew Foundation and they're very simple goal is to stop all fishing.
Get used to it.
A bit simplistic I think, but worthy of some discussion.

Actually, the Pew Trusts (at least as I understand it and that is not all that well) exist to create a counterbalance to the economic interests that favor over-exploitation of environmental resources. It funds many groups. Some are indeed radically anti-use, but others....and I think the CLF is one.....are more balanced. Their interest seems to be in restoring fish populations closer to pre-industrial fishing levels. Fishing is not an issue for them if it can be done responsibly, but preserving someone's "right" to fish or make a living fishing is not their priority......restoring fish populations is.

From a recreational (or consumer) standpoint it is hard to see how more abundant fish would be a bad thing. The issue is access to those fish. MPA's are coming in the areas we fish (just ask the guys in California). If fishermen, both recreational and commercial, had been able to control their greed and fish more responsibly MPA's would not be necessary. We can't....so we will get screwed.......and we have only ourselves (not the Pew Trust) to blame.
numbskull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 08:22 AM   #24
Sea Dangles
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Sea Dangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
MPA?

PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
Sea Dangles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 08:57 AM   #25
Nebe
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Nebe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles View Post
MPA?
Marine protection area. A huge block of water that no one is allowed to fish in. It's like a bird sanctuary.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Nebe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 09:46 AM   #26
niko
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
niko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: marshfield
Posts: 3,620
it's amazing to see what a mpa does for an area. the way life bounces back is truely amazing. one of the problems with them though is that other areas get hammered with all the fishing pressure that gets shifted to them. as an angler it would be very sad to see stellwagen as an mpa - which is what they want. there's got to be a happy medium

my 1st wife didn't like me fishing so much
niko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2010, 06:51 PM   #27
robc22
zziplex lover
iTrader: (0)
 
robc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: upper cape cod, MA
Posts: 856
you know it..........

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles View Post
MPA?
MPA=Maximum Protection from Anglers.......

Lobster Troll #1
robc22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2010, 10:33 AM   #28
Adam_777
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
Adam_777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: N.K.
Posts: 1,330
They start small and eventually they'll take it all.Only thing everyone in their fancy boats will be able to do in a few years is have lunch and pull water skis.Sell the boats, the cost per trip/slip to try and pay for the amount of fish means nothing to these people in charge.NOTHING.Boat yards will see less $$ shops at the boat yards see less $$$.The bait guy gets less $$$.We are losing it all little by little.Seems like there's not much we can do about it.....
Adam_777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2010, 10:51 AM   #29
JohnR
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,270
Blog Entries: 1
I agree we're losing little by little, death by 1,000 cuts. However, we have also from time to time been the excessive ones impacting too much. Unfortunately, fisheries management is far from a well oiled (and accurate) machine.

~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~

Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers


Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.


Apocalypse is Coming:
JohnR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com