|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
02-03-2011, 12:44 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Al Gore and global warming
Like many sportsmen, I have a concern for the health of our environment. Before my kids were born, I spent more time on the water, and more time in the woods (hiking and photography), then most.
That being said, it's unbelievable to me that ANYONE can listen to Al Gore on this subject. He has made millions of dollars from his books and movies, and if we listen to him and impose cap and trade, he might become the world's first trillionaire (he bought a huge stake in the exchange that would trade carbon credits).
That being said, how can ANYONE take anything he says seriously? All those liberals who claimed that Bush/Cheney only invaded Iraq so that their Halliburton shares would increase in value, all those folks dismiss Gore's obvious conflict of interest here?
Michael Savage is a conservative radio host who I never listen to, he's too abrasive for my taste. But he now referes to Al Gore as "Al Goreleoni" (rhymes with Coreleoni from the Godfather), which caused me to crack up.
Finally, let's not forget that Al Gore's house, at one time, had the 3rd largest electric bill in all of Tennessee, and he flies on a private jet. So if he's right, and we all did what he did, we'd be in big trouble.
What am I missing? How has Gore managed to pull this off?
|
|
|
|
02-03-2011, 01:07 PM
|
#2
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,205
|
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
02-03-2011, 01:28 PM
|
#3
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Jim:
Two things.
1. You must listen to Savae occasionally, as his book title and one of his catch phrase, is your catch phrase
2. Among scientists Al Gore is not the focal point of climate change, the SCIENCE is. He's a bit like Sarah Palin in that the left fixates on here; the right loves to fixate on Gore.
I could give a flying #^&#^&#^&#^& what Al Gore does, or does not do. does some of what he does make him a hypocrite? absolutely. I'm no Gore apologist. As far as him making a fortune off cap and trade; he is also taking a big risk if it doesn't move forward in away that favors him, no?
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
02-03-2011, 01:50 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Jim:
Two things.
1. You must listen to Savae occasionally, as his book title and one of his catch phrase, is your catch phrase
2. Among scientists Al Gore is not the focal point of climate change, the SCIENCE is. He's a bit like Sarah Palin in that the left fixates on here; the right loves to fixate on Gore.
I could give a flying #^&#^&#^&#^& what Al Gore does, or does not do. does some of what he does make him a hypocrite? absolutely. I'm no Gore apologist. As far as him making a fortune off cap and trade; he is also taking a big risk if it doesn't move forward in away that favors him, no?
|
I have never listened to him, don't know when he's on, don't know what station he's on, could not tell you the titles of any of his books. That catch phrase we share is something I came up with based on my own observations, such as the observation I made here.
"he is also taking a big risk if it doesn't move forward in away that favors him, no?"
No. The exchange he owns a huge share of makes money today. It would make way more money if cap and trade were imposed. Plus, he has made a fortune on his books and movies and speaking engagements, so no, there'e not a whole lot of risk there.
You say Gore is not the focal point? His book sales make me question that.
I didn't ask if he was the focal point. I asked why liberals aren't NEARLY as skeptical about his motives with this issue, as they were with Bush/Cheney in Iraq. I don't know that anyone can prove that Bush/Cheney personally profited from Iraq, but Gore has sure profited from the global warming hype. I don't know if anyone can prove that Bush didn't genuinely believe there were WMDs in Iraq. But Gore's lifestyle would make any rational person question whether or not he believes what he's saying.
To be aware of Gore's lifestyle, and to also believe he cares about the environment, is, well, symptomatic of a mental disorder. How else can you call Gore the hero of this movement, when his environmental footprint dwarfs that of everyone else?
I don't need Michael Savage to tell me that liberalism is a mental disorder. Liberals make that crystal clear by endorsing a political agenda that insists that Osama Bin Laden deserves to live, but not the unborn baby in my wife's belly. They make it crystal clear by suggesting that massive government entitlements are the way to prosperity, despite what's happening to European economies as I type this. If that's not deranged, I just don't know what is.
Last edited by Jim in CT; 02-03-2011 at 02:16 PM..
|
|
|
|
02-03-2011, 02:52 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 4,834
|
He sure doesn't help the cause!
|
|
|
|
02-03-2011, 03:05 PM
|
#6
|
........
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
|
well if nothing else he may have paved the way for us as a society to live beneath the ground in subterainian homes instead of on top of the EARTH.
i HAVE NEVER READ A THING ABOUT HIM OR LISTENED TO A SPEECH OR WATCHED HIS MOVIES...
Do i believe climate change is upon us....absolutely ..is it man made ?
doubtful , but Nature knows how to balance the equilibrium with the right amount of forestation to open areas and is the greatest teacher of all , Words spoken by Jesus in Fact.... not that i'm a Jesus freak
Just saying
|
|
|
|
02-03-2011, 03:39 PM
|
#7
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Liberals make that crystal clear by endorsing a political agenda that insists that Osama Bin Laden deserves to live, but not the unborn baby in my wife's belly.
|
Sorry Jim.
this right turn in your response just negated any chance of my answering it with anything logical.
Good luck with your forthcoming baby and future attempts at running for office someday.
Bryan
Last edited by RIROCKHOUND; 02-03-2011 at 03:48 PM..
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
02-03-2011, 04:11 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Sorry Jim.
this right turn in your response just negated any chance of my answering it with anything logical.
Good luck with your forthcoming baby and future attempts at running for office someday.
Bryan
|
You've insinuated (here and elsewhere) that I only call liberalism a mental disorder because I'm regurgitating talking points from Michael Savage. I respond by pointing out one of the cornerstones of liberal doctrine, one which to me is utterly indefensible.
My response, I feel, is pretty much on point. I notice that instead of trying to explain that part of the liberal agenda, you chose to end the debate.
|
|
|
|
02-03-2011, 01:46 PM
|
#9
|
sick of bluefish
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 8,672
|
I'm agreeing with Dad F on this one.
|
making s-b.com a kinder, gentler place for all
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:40 PM.
|
| |