TRUMP wont do debates

[wdmso]

He is worried which media personality will be chosen as the debate moderator.”

Guess who else skips debates...( omg Putin what a coincidence) maybe this is where he got the idea

[RIROCKHOUND]

Originally Posted by wdmso

He is worried which media personality will be chosen as the debate moderator.”

Guess who else skips debates...( omg Putin what a coincidence) maybe this is where he got the idea

We have debated this over the coffee pot at work. It wouldn't surprise me, however I think he will ultimately have to do at least one, otherwise the other candidate will just call him a coward and he won't do that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Get Hannity to moderate.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[JohnR]

Anddddd the further down the rabbit hole we go, lack of non-bias in media continues to rear its ugly head. Trump (who should debate) can blame realistic unfairness in coverage just like actual Fake News provides cover for his fake Fake News.

Ahhh it is to reminisce to the days when Romney was going to kill 47% percent of the US with his Baine Capital Binders full of wimin...

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by JohnR

Anddddd the further down the rabbit hole we go, lack of non-bias in media continues to rear its ugly head. Trump (who should debate) can blame realistic unfairness in coverage just like actual Fake News provides cover for his fake Fake News.

Ahhh it is to reminisce to the days when Romney was going to kill 47% percent of the US with his Baine Capital Binders full of wimin...

Realistic unfairness thats funny.. you suggest he has done nothing to garner the attention he gets

I doubt he would debate with questions taken from a Hat or a computer . He would still wave the bias flag .
The man just can't answer hard questions . Hes good at pointing fingers and lying
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by JohnR

Ahhh it is to reminisce to the days when Romney was going to kill 47% percent of the US

didn't he actually say he wouldn't care about 47% of Americans if he got elected. Think about that statement and what it means for the president to say that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by PaulS

didn't he actually say he wouldn't care about 47% of Americans if he got elected. Think about that statement and what it means for the president to say that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You mean he was going to stick them in the Deplorable Basket
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Realistic unfairness thats funny.. you suggest he has done nothing to garner the attention he gets

I doubt he would debate with questions taken from a Hat or a computer . He would still wave the bias flag .
The man just can't answer hard questions . Hes good at pointing fingers and lying
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Oh he absolutely has done plenty of things to garner a sizeable amount of attention. Probably half the time it is justified. But he, like any other Republican, will not get a fair deal from the media. This is why we not have a Trump. Remember, Romney was going to be like Hitler, after the Bu#^&#^&#^&#^&ler of course, and now we have Trumphitler.

Originally Posted by PaulS

didn't he actually say he wouldn't care about 47% of Americans if he got elected. Think about that statement and what it means for the president to say that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No, he said that 47% of the population were not going to vote for him no matter what because, his quote:

"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what," Romney said in the video. "All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that's an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what."

But remember, he had binders full of women qualified to run various departments that were going to be part of his administration. But the media ran with that to cudgel him. And that he was going to steal everyone's money, make grandma homeless.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

You mean he was going to stick them in the Deplorable Basket
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

so what do you call the hugh percentage of Republicans who still to this day think Obama is a Muslim and born in Kenya w/o ever having the slightest bit of evidence? Aren't they deplorable? And didn't Hillary apologize for saying that? So there's a false equivalency between constantly using that and sitting quietly on your hands not saying anything about Trump's constant insults. Hipocracy at its finest.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

didn't he actually say he wouldn't care about 47% of Americans if he got elected. Think about that statement and what it means for the president to say that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

he said 47% americans would
vote for obama because they feel entitled to have the government take care of them, and they feel like
victims. it was a stupid comment. I don’t think he said he wouldn’t care about them. Romney was a good
guy, not very exciting, but not what you were told
he is either. They made a big deal
that he had resumes if i
pressure women in a notebook, for god’s sake.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

he said 47% americans would
vote for obama because they feel entitled to have the government take care of them, and they feel like
victims. it was a stupid comment. I don’t think he said he wouldn’t care about them. Romney was a good
guy, not very exciting, but not what you were told
he is either. They made a big deal
that he had resumes of impressive women in a notebook, for god’s sake.

Democrats can’t debate ideas anymore, all they have is personal
attacks.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by spence

Get Hannity to moderate.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Dont think he would take the risk..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Informed vs. uninformed
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Informed vs. uninformed
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

There's informed, uninformed and just plain stupid. Who do you think you are in this discussion?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

There's informed, uninformed and just plain stupid. Who do you think you are in this discussion?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I am informed. You sewed up the stupid award long ago and cement the title every post.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

I am informed. You sewed up the stupid award long ago and cement the title every post.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

but you posted because you thought I was uninformed. In fact you were = as you constantly are wrong. You show absolutely no intelligence here and instead try to annoy people like a 13 year old girl.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

you both need to read his full quote
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

you both need to read his full quote
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

when he was governor of massachusetts, is there any evidence he didn’t care about liberals on welfare?

he was a decent guy. painted as a sexist for keeping resumes
in a binder. that’s not crazy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

when he was governor of massachusetts, is there any evidence he didn’t care about liberals on welfare?

he was a decent guy. painted as a sexist for keeping resumes
in a binder. that’s not crazy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim it was Romney's responsibility to defend or explain that comment ... did you for get your distain for hilliarys deplorables comment. Did you forgive her explanation or accept her apology. She said it she owend it and the media reported it and the historical amnesia here is amazing

And they both paid for their mistakes
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

when he was governor of massachusetts, is there any evidence he didn’t care about liberals on welfare?

he was a decent guy. painted as a sexist for keeping resumes
in a binder. that’s not crazy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

so did you read his full statement
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

so did you read his full statement
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I did. It was stupid, and he deserved to pay a political price for it. But his actions as governor, certainly show that's not what he really feels.

I have no problem commenting on your statements about his words. I don't see that you had anything to say, about the media painting him as a knuckle dragging sexist, for having a binder of resumes of talented women. Can't say anything bad about your side, just attack the other side.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I did. It was stupid, and he deserved to pay a political price for it. But his actions as governor, certainly show that's not what he really feels.

I have no problem commenting on your statements about his words. I don't see that you had anything to say, about the media painting him as a knuckle dragging sexist, for having a binder of resumes of talented women. Can't say anything bad about your side, just attack the other side.

I pointed out that I was correct and that your comment to my statement was in fact wrong because you left out the most important part. So maybe that's why he didn't win the election that he didn't think he had to care about almost half of The Americans. I suppose you're going to throw out one of your classless insults that I'm foaming at the mouth. When in fact that's what you do constantly.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Wrong again tough guy🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Wrong again tough guy🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

in fact I was a hundred percent correct. Show me how I'm wrong? did you mean John and Jim were uninformed?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

These are some SORE LOSERS.🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

These are some SORE LOSERS.🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

that’s what it is. When Bush won, it was because of the angry white man ( literally, that was the story). Then everyone who voted against Obama was racist, everyone who voted against Hilary is a sexist.

It’s literally not possible for the left to admit they lost a fair, principled vote. Every time they lose, they convince themselves they lost to hate, because it’s acceptable, even noble, to go down fighting against hate and bigotry.

I don’t believe many people
think obama wasn’t born here, not after he showed the long form. but some idiots still do, just as some believe that my being pro life means i’m waging war on women. Some people will believe whatever they are told. Sad but true.

As for Obama’s being Muslim, I wish he was, because Islam makes a lot more sense to me, than the racist bile Obama embraced in Rev Wright’s “church” for decades. Turns out not even the Rev believes any of that crap as he cashed out and bought a multimillion dollar house surrounded by honkeys.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device