| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
05-03-2017, 10:24 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Narragansett
Posts: 903
|
Access to Misquamicut
According to ProJo the state (along with Save the Bay, RISAA, et al) lost the court case seeking public access to the 2 mile stretch of beach from the Weekapaug Breachway to just east of Misquamicut State Beach. I think the implication is that homeowners cannot only deny access but erect fences to the mean high tide mark. Where that mark rests will become another bone of contention, I imagine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-03-2017, 06:09 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 333
|
when there beach needs replenishment they can pay for it themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-03-2017, 06:27 PM
|
#3
|
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,270
|
|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
|
|
05-03-2017, 10:22 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sturbridge MA
Posts: 3,127
|
So if you were to park at the breachway and walk west along the beach there is no issue right? Gaining access through a public ROW and staying below mean high water line is still the law of the land correct? They are calling int question the right to use land above the high water mark.
I'm not really getting where this stretch of beach is. Says from "2½-mile oceanfront stretch, spanning from the Weekapaug breachway to just east of Misquamicut State Beach." I know where Misqmuaicut is on a map but don't think i understand where the demarcation is of Misquamicut beach. Sucks anyway you slice it.
|
Everything is better on the rocks.
|
|
|
|
|
05-03-2017, 10:58 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,690
|
A-holes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-04-2017, 04:32 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,371
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
A-holes.
|
which ones? those who won or those who failed to respect the hi tide mark .. seems like one of those cases where no one has clean hands. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-04-2017, 06:16 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Narragansett
Posts: 903
|
[QUOTE=Rob Rockcrawler;1121325]So if you were to park at the breachway and walk west along the beach there is no issue right? Gaining access through a public ROW and staying below mean high water line is still the law of the land correct? They are calling int question the right to use land above the high water mark.
Seemingly, that's the case, but if history repeats itself, the homeowners will be out barking at "interlopers" ( tide line notwithstanding) and threatening to call the police, which is fine. I believe the stretch of beach runs from the breachway to Misquamicut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-04-2017, 07:38 AM
|
#8
|
|
Pete K.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,953
|
no more vehicles in the fall on the beach on that stretch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-04-2017, 07:45 AM
|
#9
|
|
Pete K.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,953
|
sets a dangerous precedent. How many Rhode island property owners will try for the same, and reference this case?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-04-2017, 07:49 AM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,690
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ivanputski
sets a dangerous precedent. How many Rhode island property owners will try for the same, and reference this case?
|
That will be a huge problem along rocky areas.
We are allowed 1 wagon width above mean high water.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 PM.
|
| |
